mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discourse Centric Evaluation of Machine Translation with a Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus

arXiv 2305.11142 ↗First posted 18 May 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Several recent papers claim human parity at sentence-level Machine Translation (MT), especially in high-resource languages. Thus, in response, the MT community has, in part, shifted its focus to document-level translation. Translating documents requires a deeper understanding of the structure and meaning of text, which is often captured by various kinds of discourse phenomena such as consistency, coherence, and cohesion. However, this renders conventional sentence-level MT evaluation benchmarks inadequate for evaluating the performance of context-aware MT systems. This paper presents a new dataset with rich discourse annotations, built upon the large-scale parallel corpus BWB introduced in Jiang et al. (2022). The new BWB annotation introduces four extra evaluation aspects, i.e., entity, terminology, coreference, and quotation, covering 15,095 entity mentions in both languages. Using these annotations, we systematically investigate the similarities and differences between the discourse structures of source and target languages, and the challenges they pose to MT. We discover that MT outputs differ fundamentally from human translations in terms of their latent discourse structures. This gives us a new perspective on the challenges and opportunities in document-level MT. We make our resource publicly available to spur future research in document-level MT and the generalization to other language translation tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.

Builds on

22 of 72 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 915
  7. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 834
  8. 2017End-to-end Neural Coreference Resolutioncited by 241
  9. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 203
  10. 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
  11. 2017Neural Machine Translation with Extended Contextcited by 95
  12. 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
10 more
  1. 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
  2. 2018Improving the Transformer Translation Model with Document-Level Contextcited by 74
  3. 2021BlonDe: An Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document-level Machine Translationcited by 58
  4. 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
  5. 2017A Challenge Set Approach to Evaluating Machine Translationcited by 37
  6. 2022DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for Translationcited by 36
  7. 2020A Set of Recommendations for Assessing Human-Machine Parity in Language Translationcited by 34
  8. 2021On the Evaluation of Machine Translation for Terminology Consistencycited by 15
  9. 2018Automatic Reference-Based Evaluation of Pronoun Translation Misses the Pointcited by 6
  10. 2022Investigating the Role of Centering Theory in the Context of Neural Coreference Resolution Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.