mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BlindHarmony: "Blind" Harmonization for MR Images via Flow model

arXiv 2305.10732 ↗First posted 18 May 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In MRI, images of the same contrast (e.g., T1) from the same subject can exhibit noticeable differences when acquired using different hardware, sequences, or scan parameters. These differences in images create a domain gap that needs to be bridged by a step called image harmonization, to process the images successfully using conventional or deep learning-based image analysis (e.g., segmentation). Several methods, including deep learning-based approaches, have been proposed to achieve image harmonization. However, they often require datasets from multiple domains for deep learning training and may still be unsuccessful when applied to images from unseen domains. To address this limitation, we propose a novel concept called `Blind Harmonization', which utilizes only target domain data for training but still has the capability to harmonize images from unseen domains. For the implementation of blind harmonization, we developed BlindHarmony using an unconditional flow model trained on target domain data. The harmonized image is optimized to have a correlation with the input source domain image while ensuring that the latent vector of the flow model is close to the center of the Gaussian distribution. BlindHarmony was evaluated on both simulated and real datasets and compared to conventional methods. BlindHarmony demonstrated noticeable performance on both datasets, highlighting its potential for future use in clinical settings. The source code is available at: https://github.com/SNU-LIST/BlindHarmony

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 53 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  3. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  5. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
  6. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  7. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
  8. 2020StyleFlow: Attribute-conditioned Exploration of StyleGAN-Generated Images using Conditional Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 349
  9. 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 342
  10. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 339
  11. 2021Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priorscited by 286
  12. 2020SRFlow: Learning the Super-Resolution Space with Normalizing Flowcited by 209
11 more
  1. 2019Noise Flow: Noise Modeling with Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 108
  2. 2019Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biascited by 94
  3. 2021Unsupervised MRI Reconstruction via Zero-Shot Learned Adversarial Transformerscited by 77
  4. 2017Residual and Plain Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Brain MRI Classificationcited by 48
  5. 2017A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentationcited by 35
  6. 2020Solving Inverse Problems with a Flow-based Noise Modelcited by 31
  7. 2019MRI Reconstruction Using Deep Bayesian Estimationcited by 29
  8. 2018Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using Deep Neural Network: QSMnetcited by 24
  9. 2021Deep Unfolding with Normalizing Flow Priors for Inverse Problemscited by 23
  10. 2020Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable Neural Distribution Alignmentcited by 10
  11. 2022FS-NCSR: Increasing Diversity of the Super-Resolution Space via Frequency Separation and Noise-Conditioned Normalizing Flowcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.