mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toxicity Inspector: A Framework to Evaluate Ground Truth in Toxicity Detection Through Feedback

arXiv 2305.10433 ↗First posted 11 May 2023cs.CL cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Toxic language is difficult to define, as it is not monolithic and has many variations in perceptions of toxicity. This challenge of detecting toxic language is increased by the highly contextual and subjectivity of its interpretation, which can degrade the reliability of datasets and negatively affect detection model performance. To fill this void, this paper introduces a toxicity inspector framework that incorporates a human-in-the-loop pipeline with the aim of enhancing the reliability of toxicity benchmark datasets by centering the evaluator's values through an iterative feedback cycle. The centerpiece of this framework is the iterative feedback process, which is guided by two metric types (hard and soft) that provide evaluators and dataset creators with insightful examination to balance the tradeoff between performance gains and toxicity avoidance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2023.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  3. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
  4. 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 139
  5. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  6. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 116
  7. 2021Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 82

Built on by

Not cited yet.