mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mitigating Group Bias in Federated Learning: Beyond Local Fairness

arXiv 2305.09931 ↗First posted 17 May 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The issue of group fairness in machine learning models, where certain sub-populations or groups are favored over others, has been recognized for some time. While many mitigation strategies have been proposed in centralized learning, many of these methods are not directly applicable in federated learning, where data is privately stored on multiple clients. To address this, many proposals try to mitigate bias at the level of clients before aggregation, which we call locally fair training. However, the effectiveness of these approaches is not well understood. In this work, we investigate the theoretical foundation of locally fair training by studying the relationship between global model fairness and local model fairness. Additionally, we prove that for a broad class of fairness metrics, the global model's fairness can be obtained using only summary statistics from local clients. Based on that, we propose a globally fair training algorithm that directly minimizes the penalized empirical loss. Real-data experiments demonstrate the promising performance of our proposed approach for enhancing fairness while retaining high accuracy compared to locally fair training methods.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.

Builds on

29 of 46 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  7. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  8. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  9. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  10. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  11. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
  12. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
17 more
  1. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  2. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  3. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  4. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  5. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 148
  6. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 118
  7. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  8. 2020Fairness-aware Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 87
  9. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  10. 2020Mitigating Bias in Federated Learningcited by 56
  11. 2021Improving Fairness via Federated Learningcited by 39
  12. 2021Enforcing fairness in private federated learning via the modified method of differential multiplierscited by 38
  13. 2021Training Fair Models in Federated Learning without Data Privacy Infringementcited by 26
  14. 2022Minimax Demographic Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 24
  15. 2021GIFAIR-FL: A Framework for Group and Individual Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 21
  16. 2022Fair Federated Learning via Bounded Group Losscited by 12
  17. 2022Towards Multi-Objective Statistically Fair Federated Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.