mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Outage Performance and Novel Loss Function for an ML-Assisted Resource Allocation: An Exact Analytical Framework

arXiv 2305.09739 ↗First posted 16 May 2023eess.SP stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel loss function to minimize the outage probability of an ML-based resource allocation system. A single-user multi-resource greedy allocation strategy constitutes our application scenario, for which an ML binary classification predictor assists in selecting a resource satisfying the established outage criterium. While other resource allocation policies may be suitable, they are not the focus of our study. Instead, our primary emphasis is on theoretically developing this loss function and leveraging it to train an ML model to address the outage probability challenge. With no access to future channel state information, this predictor foresees each resource's likely future outage status. When the predictor encounters a resource it believes will be satisfactory, it allocates it to the user. Our main result establishes exact and asymptotic expressions for this system's outage probability. These expressions reveal that focusing solely on the optimization of the per-resource outage probability conditioned on the ML predictor recommending resource allocation (a strategy that appears to be most appropriate) may produce inadequate predictors that reject every resource. They also reveal that focusing on standard metrics, like precision, false-positive rate, or recall, may not produce optimal predictors. With our result, we formulate a theoretically optimal, differentiable loss function to train our predictor. We then compare predictors trained using this and traditional loss functions namely, binary cross-entropy (BCE), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). In all scenarios, predictors trained using our novel loss function provide superior outage probability performance. Moreover, in some cases, our loss function outperforms predictors trained with BCE, MAE, and MSE by multiple orders of magnitude.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2023.

Builds on

15 of 65 references.

References · 15

  1. 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 416
  2. 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
  3. 2019DeepMIMO: A Generic Deep Learning Dataset for Millimeter Wave and Massive MIMO Applicationscited by 121
  4. 2019Deep Learning for mmWave Beam and Blockage Prediction Using Sub-6GHz Channelscited by 41
  5. 2020High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative Networkscited by 33
  6. 2021Vision-Aided 6G Wireless Communications: Blockage Prediction and Proactive Handoffcited by 30
  7. 2019Millimeter Wave Base Stations with Cameras: Vision Aided Beam and Blockage Predictioncited by 29
  8. 2019Deep Learning for TDD and FDD Massive MIMO: Mapping Channels in Space and Frequencycited by 16
  9. 20206G White Paper on Machine Learning in Wireless Communication Networkscited by 14
  10. 2018Deep Learning Power Allocation in Massive MIMOcited by 13
  11. 2018Machine Learning for Reliable mmWave Systems: Blockage Prediction and Proactive Handoffcited by 11
  12. 2019Next Generation Terahertz Communications: A Rendezvous of Sensing, Imaging, and Localizationcited by 7
3 more
  1. 2021Prediction of mmWave/THz Link Blockages through Meta-Learning and Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 6
  2. 2022AI-Based Channel Prediction in D2D Links: An Empirical Validationcited by 3
  3. 2019Unsupervised Deep Learning for Ultra-reliable and Low-latency Communicationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.