mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Private Truly-Everlasting Robust-Prediction

arXiv 2401.04311 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Private Everlasting Prediction (PEP), recently introduced by Naor et al. [2023], is a model for differentially private learning in which the learner never publicly releases a hypothesis. Instead, it provides black-box access to a "prediction oracle" that can predict the labels of an endless stream of unlabeled examples drawn from the underlying distribution. Importantly, PEP provides privacy both for the initial training set and for the endless stream of classification queries. We present two conceptual modifications to the definition of PEP, as well as new constructions exhibiting significant improvements over prior work. Specifically, (1) Robustness: PEP only guarantees accuracy provided that all the classification queries are drawn from the correct underlying distribution. A few out-of-distribution queries might break the validity of the prediction oracle for future queries, even for future queries which are sampled from the correct distribution. We incorporate robustness against such poisoning attacks into the definition of PEP, and show how to obtain it. (2) Dependence of the privacy parameter δ in the time horizon: We present a relaxed privacy definition, suitable for PEP, that allows us to disconnect the privacy parameter δ from the number of total time steps T. This allows us to obtain algorithms for PEP whose sample complexity is independent from T, thereby making them "truly everlasting". This is in contrast to prior work where the sample complexity grows with polylog(T). (3) New constructions: Prior constructions for PEP exhibit sample complexity that is quadratic in the VC dimension of the target class. We present new constructions of PEP for axis-aligned rectangles and for decision-stumps that exhibit sample complexity linear in the dimension (instead of quadratic). We show that our constructions satisfy very strong robustness properties.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2024.

Builds on

9 of 18 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 58
  2. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  3. 2016Make Up Your Mind: The Price of Online Queries in Differential Privacycited by 26
  4. 2020The Trade-Offs of Private Predictioncited by 22
  5. 2019Privately Answering Classification Queries in the Agnostic PAC Modelcited by 18
  6. 2022~Optimal Differentially Private Learning of Thresholds and Quasi-Concave Optimizationcited by 16
  7. 2019PAC learning with stable and private predictionscited by 9
  8. 2023Private Everlasting Predictioncited by 5
  9. 2015Order-Revealing Encryption and the Hardness of Private Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.