mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Professional Certification Benchmark Dataset: The First 500 Jobs For Large Language Models

arXiv 2305.05377 ↗First posted 7 May 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The research creates a professional certification survey to test large language models and evaluate their employable skills. It compares the performance of two AI models, GPT-3 and Turbo-GPT3.5, on a benchmark dataset of 1149 professional certifications, emphasizing vocational readiness rather than academic performance. GPT-3 achieved a passing score (>70% correct) in 39% of the professional certifications without fine-tuning or exam preparation. The models demonstrated qualifications in various computer-related fields, such as cloud and virtualization, business analytics, cybersecurity, network setup and repair, and data analytics. Turbo-GPT3.5 scored 100% on the valuable Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP) exam. The models also displayed competence in other professional domains, including nursing, licensed counseling, pharmacy, and teaching. Turbo-GPT3.5 passed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Series 6 exam with a 70% grade without preparation. Interestingly, Turbo-GPT3.5 performed well on customer service tasks, suggesting potential applications in human augmentation for chatbots in call centers and routine advice services. The models also score well on sensory and experience-based tests such as wine sommelier, beer taster, emotional quotient, and body language reader. The OpenAI model improvement from Babbage to Turbo resulted in a median 60% better-graded performance in less than a few years. This progress suggests that focusing on the latest model's shortcomings could lead to a highly performant AI capable of mastering the most demanding professional certifications. We open-source the benchmark to expand the range of testable professional skills as the models improve or gain emergent capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2023.

Builds on

26 of 53 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  2. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
  3. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  4. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
  5. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  7. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
  8. 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
  9. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
  11. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 167
  12. 2023Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translationcited by 138
14 more
  1. 2023How well do Large Language Models perform in Arithmetic tasks?cited by 130
  2. 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 123
  3. 2021PsyQA: A Chinese Dataset for Generating Long Counseling Text for Mental Health Supportcited by 92
  4. 2023A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?cited by 84
  5. 2022GPT Takes the Bar Examcited by 65
  6. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on a Highly-specialized Topic, Radiation Oncology Physicscited by 49
  7. 2023ParroT: Translating during Chat using Large Language Models tuned with Human Translation and Feedbackcited by 34
  8. 2023Mind meets machine: Unravelling GPT-4's cognitive psychologycited by 31
  9. 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Models on Brazilian University Admission Examscited by 25
  10. 2023Performance of ChatGPT on the US Fundamentals of Engineering Exam: Comprehensive Assessment of Proficiency and Potential Implications for Professional Environmental Engineering Practicecited by 15
  11. 2022The Turing Deceptioncited by 5
  12. 2022Towards Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Table Question Answering using GPT-3cited by 4
  13. 2021Local Translation Services for Neglected Languagescited by 2
  14. 2023Creating Large Language Model Resistant Exams: Guidelines and Strategiescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.