Truncating Trajectories in Monte Carlo Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), an agent acts in an unknown environment to maximize the expected cumulative discounted sum of an external reward signal, i.e., the expected return. In practice, in many tasks of interest, such as policy optimization, the agent usually spends its interaction budget by collecting episodes of fixed length within a simulator (i.e., Monte Carlo simulation). However, given the discounted nature of the RL objective, this data collection strategy might not be the best option. Indeed, the rewards taken in early simulation steps weigh exponentially more than future rewards. Taking a cue from this intuition, in this paper, we design an a-priori budget allocation strategy that leads to the collection of trajectories of different lengths, i.e., truncated. The proposed approach provably minimizes the width of the confidence intervals around the empirical estimates of the expected return of a policy. After discussing the theoretical properties of our method, we make use of our trajectory truncation mechanism to extend Policy Optimization via Importance Sampling (POIS, Metelli et al., 2018) algorithm. Finally, we conduct a numerical comparison between our algorithm and POIS: the results are consistent with our theory and show that an appropriate truncation of the trajectories can succeed in improving performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2023.
Builds on
24 of 52 references.
References · 24
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 883
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 286
- 2019Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions--a surveycited by 136
- 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 123
- 2020CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimationcited by 64
- 2020OR-Gym: A Reinforcement Learning Library for Operations Research Problemscited by 51
12 more
- 2018Policy Optimization via Importance Samplingcited by 47
- 2018Truncated Horizon Policy Search: Combining Reinforcement Learning & Imitation Learningcited by 39
- 2016Multi-fidelity Gaussian Process Bandit Optimisationcited by 31
- 2017Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient for Urban Traffic Light Controlcited by 30
- 2015How to Discount Deep Reinforcement Learning: Towards New Dynamic Strategiescited by 27
- 2016The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Banditcited by 22
- 2019Smoothing Policies and Safe Policy Gradientscited by 21
- 2018Importance Weighted Transfer of Samples in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2022ReVar: Strengthening Policy Evaluation via Reduced Variance Samplingcited by 16
- 2021Lifelong Hyper-Policy Optimization with Multiple Importance Sampling Regularizationcited by 5
- 2022Adaptive Rollout Length for Model-Based RL Using Model-Free Deep RLcited by 5
- 2020Cooperative Policy Learning with Pre-trained Heterogeneous Observation Representationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.