Rethinking Population-assisted Off-policy Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are sample efficient due to gradient-based updates and data reuse in the replay buffer, they struggle with convergence to local optima due to limited exploration. On the other hand, population-based algorithms offer a natural exploration strategy, but their heuristic black-box operators are inefficient. Recent algorithms have integrated these two methods, connecting them through a shared replay buffer. However, the effect of using diverse data from population optimization iterations on off-policy RL algorithms has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we first analyze the use of off-policy RL algorithms in combination with population-based algorithms, showing that the use of population data could introduce an overlooked error and harm performance. To test this, we propose a uniform and scalable training design and conduct experiments on our tailored framework in robot locomotion tasks from the OpenAI gym. Our results substantiate that using population data in off-policy RL can cause instability during training and even degrade performance. To remedy this issue, we further propose a double replay buffer design that provides more on-policy data and show its effectiveness through experiments. Our results offer practical insights for training these hybrid methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
- 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
- 2018Evolution-Guided Policy Gradient in Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
- 2018CEM-RL: Combining evolutionary and gradient-based methods for policy searchcited by 53
- 2020Experience Replay with Likelihood-free Importance Weightscited by 42
- 2018GEP-PG: Decoupling Exploration and Exploitation in Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 40
- 2019Collaborative Evolutionary Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
9 more
- 2022EvoJAX: Hardware-Accelerated Neuroevolutioncited by 29
- 2018Back to Basics: Benchmarking Canonical Evolution Strategies for Playing Ataricited by 26
- 2019Proximal Distilled Evolutionary Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2023Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 24
- 2023EvoX: A Distributed GPU-accelerated Framework for Scalable Evolutionary Computationcited by 16
- 2020An Efficient Asynchronous Method for Integrating Evolutionary and Gradient-based Policy Searchcited by 12
- 2018Smoothed Action Value Functions for Learning Gaussian Policiescited by 6
- 2019Exploiting the Sign of the Advantage Function to Learn Deterministic Policies in Continuous Domainscited by 3
- 2022Lamarckian Platform: Pushing the Boundaries of Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning towards Asynchronous Commercial Gamescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.