mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrating Psychometrics and Computing Perspectives on Bias and Fairness in Affective Computing: A Case Study of Automated Video Interviews

arXiv 2305.02629 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We provide a psychometric-grounded exposition of bias and fairness as applied to a typical machine learning pipeline for affective computing. We expand on an interpersonal communication framework to elucidate how to identify sources of bias that may arise in the process of inferring human emotions and other psychological constructs from observed behavior. Various methods and metrics for measuring fairness and bias are discussed along with pertinent implications within the United States legal context. We illustrate how to measure some types of bias and fairness in a case study involving automatic personality and hireability inference from multimodal data collected in video interviews for mock job applications. We encourage affective computing researchers and practitioners to encapsulate bias and fairness in their research processes and products and to consider their role, agency, and responsibility in promoting equitable and just systems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

6 of 27 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  3. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  4. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  5. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  6. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

6 papers.