Uncertainty Aware Neural Network from Similarity and Sensitivity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Researchers have proposed several approaches for neural network (NN) based uncertainty quantification (UQ). However, most of the approaches are developed considering strong assumptions. Uncertainty quantification algorithms often perform poorly in an input domain and the reason for poor performance remains unknown. Therefore, we present a neural network training method that considers similar samples with sensitivity awareness in this paper. In the proposed NN training method for UQ, first, we train a shallow NN for the point prediction. Then, we compute the absolute differences between prediction and targets and train another NN for predicting those absolute differences or absolute errors. Domains with high average absolute errors represent a high uncertainty. In the next step, we select each sample in the training set one by one and compute both prediction and error sensitivities. Then we select similar samples with sensitivity consideration and save indexes of similar samples. The ranges of an input parameter become narrower when the output is highly sensitive to that parameter. After that, we construct initial uncertainty bounds (UB) by considering the distribution of sensitivity aware similar samples. Prediction intervals (PIs) from initial uncertainty bounds are larger and cover more samples than required. Therefore, we train bound correction NN. As following all the steps for finding UB for each sample requires a lot of computation and memory access, we train a UB computation NN. The UB computation NN takes an input sample and provides an uncertainty bound. The UB computation NN is the final product of the proposed approach. Scripts of the proposed method are available in the following GitHub repository: github.com/dipuk0506/UQ
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2023.
Builds on
19 of 51 references.
References · 19
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
- 2018Revisiting Spatial-Temporal Similarity: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Predictioncited by 119
- 2021GradDiv: Adversarial Robustness of Randomized Neural Networks via Gradient Diversity Regularizationcited by 34
- 2019Sparse Variational Inference: Bayesian Coresets from Scratchcited by 28
- 2021A Survey on Epistemic (Model) Uncertainty in Supervised Learning: Recent Advances and Applicationscited by 24
- 2018On a Sparse Shortcut Topology of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2021Robustness via Uncertainty-aware Cycle Consistencycited by 16
- 2021Evaluating State-of-the-Art Classification Models Against Bayes Optimalitycited by 15
7 more
- 2020If You Like It, GAN It. Probabilistic Multivariate Times Series Forecast With GANcited by 14
- 2020Learning Prediction Intervals for Model Performancecited by 9
- 2019Correlated Parameters to Accurately Measure Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2019Optimal Uncertainty-guided Neural Network Trainingcited by 7
- 2021Towards a mathematical framework to inform Neural Network modelling via Polynomial Regressioncited by 6
- 2022Deep Forest with Hashing Screening and Window Screeningcited by 3
- 2021Accurate Prediction Using Triangular Type-2 Fuzzy Linear Regressioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.