mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Client Recruitment for Federated Learning in ICU Length of Stay Prediction

arXiv 2304.14663 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine and deep learning methods for medical and healthcare applications have shown significant progress and performance improvement in recent years. These methods require vast amounts of training data which are available in the medical sector, albeit decentralized. Medical institutions generate vast amounts of data for which sharing and centralizing remains a challenge as the result of data and privacy regulations. The federated learning technique is well-suited to tackle these challenges. However, federated learning comes with a new set of open problems related to communication overhead, efficient parameter aggregation, client selection strategies and more. In this work, we address the step prior to the initiation of a federated network for model training, client recruitment. By intelligently recruiting clients, communication overhead and overall cost of training can be reduced without sacrificing predictive performance. Client recruitment aims at pre-excluding potential clients from partaking in the federation based on a set of criteria indicative of their eventual contributions to the federation. In this work, we propose a client recruitment approach using only the output distribution and sample size at the client site. We show how a subset of clients can be recruited without sacrificing model performance whilst, at the same time, significantly improving computation time. By applying the recruitment approach to the training of federated models for accurate patient Length of Stay prediction using data from 189 Intensive Care Units, we show how the models trained in federations made up from recruited clients significantly outperform federated models trained with the standard procedure in terms of predictive power and training time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  3. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  6. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 352
  7. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
  8. 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 300
  9. 2019Privacy-preserving Federated Brain Tumour Segmentationcited by 169
  10. 2018Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 149
  11. 2020Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation in Wireless Federated Learning Networks: A Long-Term Perspectivecited by 103
  12. 2020Multi-Armed Bandit Based Client Scheduling for Federated Learningcited by 57
4 more
  1. 2021Predicting Patient Outcomes with Graph Representation Learningcited by 21
  2. 2020Temporal Pointwise Convolutional Networks for Length of Stay Prediction in the Intensive Care Unitcited by 13
  3. 2020MAB-based Client Selection for Federated Learning with Uncertain Resources in Mobile Networkscited by 11
  4. 2022Federated Learning in Multi-Center Critical Care Research: A Systematic Case Study using the eICU Databasecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.