mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regression with Sensor Data Containing Incomplete Observations

arXiv 2304.13415 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses a regression problem in which output label values are the results of sensing the magnitude of a phenomenon. A low value of such labels can mean either that the actual magnitude of the phenomenon was low or that the sensor made an incomplete observation. This leads to a bias toward lower values in labels and the resultant learning because labels may have lower values due to incomplete observations, even if the actual magnitude of the phenomenon was high. Moreover, because an incomplete observation does not provide any tags indicating incompleteness, we cannot eliminate or impute them. To address this issue, we propose a learning algorithm that explicitly models incomplete observations corrupted with an asymmetric noise that always has a negative value. We show that our algorithm is unbiased as if it were learned from uncorrupted data that does not involve incomplete observations. We demonstrate the advantages of our algorithm through numerical experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2023.

Builds on

15 of 75 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Deep Learning for Precipitation Nowcasting: A Benchmark and A New Modelcited by 180
  3. 2017DeepSD: Generating High Resolution Climate Change Projections through Single Image Super-Resolutioncited by 80
  4. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  5. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  6. 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
  7. 2018Processing of missing data by neural networkscited by 36
  8. 2018Semi-supervised Deep Kernel Learning: Regression with Unlabeled Data by Minimizing Predictive Variancecited by 33
  9. 2019Missing Not at Random in Matrix Completion: The Effectiveness of Estimating Missingness Probabilities Under a Low Nuclear Norm Assumptioncited by 29
  10. 2016Estimating the class prior and posterior from noisy positives and unlabeled datacited by 25
  11. 2020Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Arbitrary Positive Shiftcited by 23
  12. 2021Federated Learning with Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 10
3 more
  1. 2022Positive-Unlabeled Learning using Random Forests via Recursive Greedy Risk Minimizationcited by 8
  2. 2018Refining Coarse-grained Spatial Data using Auxiliary Spatial Data Sets with Various Granularitiescited by 5
  3. 2019Learning Classifiers on Positive and Unlabeled Data with Policy Gradientcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.