Positive-Unlabeled Learning using Random Forests via Recursive Greedy Risk Minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The need to learn from positive and unlabeled data, or PU learning, arises in many applications and has attracted increasing interest. While random forests are known to perform well on many tasks with positive and negative data, recent PU algorithms are generally based on deep neural networks, and the potential of tree-based PU learning is under-explored. In this paper, we propose new random forest algorithms for PU-learning. Key to our approach is a new interpretation of decision tree algorithms for positive and negative data as recursive greedy risk minimization algorithms. We extend this perspective to the PU setting to develop new decision tree learning algorithms that directly minimizes PU-data based estimators for the expected risk. This allows us to develop an efficient PU random forest algorithm, PU extra trees. Our approach features three desirable properties: it is robust to the choice of the loss function in the sense that various loss functions lead to the same decision trees; it requires little hyperparameter tuning as compared to neural network based PU learning; it supports a feature importance that directly measures a feature's contribution to risk minimization. Our algorithms demonstrate strong performance on several datasets. Our code is available at urlhttps://github.com/puetpaper/PUExtraTrees.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2022.
Builds on
8 of 40 references.
References · 8
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 120
- 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
- 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
- 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
- 2018Instance-Dependent PU Learning by Bayesian Optimal Relabelingcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
8 papers.
- 2023Beyond Myopia: Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data through Holistic Predictive Trendscited by 9
- 2023Class Prior-Free Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Taylor Variational Loss for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagerycited by 8
- 2023Community-Based Hierarchical Positive-Unlabeled (PU) Model Fusion for Chronic Disease Predictioncited by 5
- 2023Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2023Regression with Sensor Data Containing Incomplete Observationscited by 0
- 2025HOpenCls: Training Hyperspectral Image Open-Set Classifiers in Their Living Environmentscited by 0
- 2025An Effective Flow-based Method for Positive-Unlabeled Learning: 2-HNCcited by 0
- 2025Noisy-Pair Robust Representation Alignment for Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 0
- 2025Noisy-Pair Robust Representation Alignment for Positive-Unlabeled Learning30 Sep 2025
- 2025An Effective Flow-based Method for Positive-Unlabeled Learning: 2-HNC13 May 2025
- 2025HOpenCls: Training Hyperspectral Image Open-Set Classifiers in Their Living Environments21 Feb 2025
- 2023Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels20 Dec 2023
- 2023Beyond Myopia: Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data through Holistic Predictive Trends6 Oct 2023
- 2023Community-Based Hierarchical Positive-Unlabeled (PU) Model Fusion for Chronic Disease Prediction6 Sep 2023
- 2023Class Prior-Free Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Taylor Variational Loss for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery29 Aug 2023
- 2023Regression with Sensor Data Containing Incomplete Observations26 Apr 2023