Loss- and Reward-Weighting for Efficient Distributed Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces two learning schemes for distributed agents in Reinforcement Learning (RL) environments, namely Reward-Weighted (R-Weighted) and Loss-Weighted (L-Weighted) gradient merger. The R/L weighted methods replace standard practices for training multiple agents, such as summing or averaging the gradients. The core of our methods is to scale the gradient of each actor based on how high the reward (for R-Weighted) or the loss (for L-Weighted) is compared to the other actors. During training, each agent operates in differently initialized versions of the same environment, which gives different gradients from different actors. In essence, the R-Weights and L-Weights of each agent inform the other agents of its potential, which again reports which environment should be prioritized for learning. This approach of distributed learning is possible because environments that yield higher rewards, or low losses, have more critical information than environments that yield lower rewards or higher losses. We empirically demonstrate that the R-Weighted methods work superior to the state-of-the-art in multiple RL environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.
Builds on
21 of 30 references.
References · 21
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 490
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 260
- 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 260
9 more
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2022Mastering the Game of Stratego with Model-Free Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
- 2018LAG: Lazily Aggregated Gradient for Communication-Efficient Distributed Learningcited by 95
- 2020Distributional Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for Addressing Value Estimation Errorscited by 80
- 2021Fault-Tolerant Federated Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteecited by 52
- 2021Model Doctor: A Simple Gradient Aggregation Strategy for Diagnosing and Treating CNN Classifierscited by 6
- 2022MixTailor: Mixed Gradient Aggregation for Robust Learning Against Tailored Attackscited by 5
- 2019Proximal Policy Optimization with Mixed Distributed Trainingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.