mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation via Lipschitz-Regularised Variational Autoencoders

arXiv 2304.11336 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic data has been hailed as the silver bullet for privacy preserving data analysis. If a record is not real, then how could it violate a person's privacy? In addition, deep-learning based generative models are employed successfully to approximate complex high-dimensional distributions from data and draw realistic samples from this learned distribution. It is often overlooked though that generative models are prone to memorising many details of individual training records and often generate synthetic data that too closely resembles the underlying sensitive training data, hence violating strong privacy regulations as, e.g., encountered in health care. Differential privacy is the well-known state-of-the-art framework for guaranteeing protection of sensitive individuals' data, allowing aggregate statistics and even machine learning models to be released publicly without compromising privacy. The training mechanisms however often add too much noise during the training process, and thus severely compromise the utility of these private models. Even worse, the tight privacy budgets do not allow for many training epochs so that model quality cannot be properly controlled in practice. In this paper we explore an alternative approach for privately generating data that makes direct use of the inherent stochasticity in generative models, e.g., variational autoencoders. The main idea is to appropriately constrain the continuity modulus of the deep models instead of adding another noise mechanism on top. For this approach, we derive mathematically rigorous privacy guarantees and illustrate its effectiveness with practical experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2023.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,718
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,273
  3. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,226
  4. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,621
  5. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 497
  6. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  7. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 296
  8. 2017VAE with a VampPriorcited by 247
  9. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 235
  10. 2019Reconstruction and Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Modelscited by 122
  11. 2020DP-CGAN: Differentially Private Synthetic Data and Label Generationcited by 118
  12. 2020Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Daycited by 108
4 more
  1. 2020VAEM: a Deep Generative Model for Heterogeneous Mixed Type Datacited by 66
  2. 2015Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlocited by 62
  3. 2019G-PATE: Scalable Differentially Private Data Generator via Private Aggregation of Teacher Discriminatorscited by 53
  4. 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.