DAS-N2N: Machine learning Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) signal denoising without clean data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article presents a weakly supervised machine learning method, which we call DAS-N2N, for suppressing strong random noise in distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) recordings. DAS-N2N requires no manually produced labels (i.e., pre-determined examples of clean event signals or sections of noise) for training and aims to map random noise processes to a chosen summary statistic, such as the distribution mean, median or mode, whilst retaining the true underlying signal. This is achieved by splicing (joining together) two fibres hosted within a single optical cable, recording two noisy copies of the same underlying signal corrupted by different independent realizations of random observational noise. A deep learning model can then be trained using only these two noisy copies of the data to produce a near fully-denoised copy. Once the model is trained, only noisy data from a single fibre is required. Using a dataset from a DAS array deployed on the surface of the Rutford Ice Stream in Antarctica, we demonstrate that DAS-N2N greatly suppresses incoherent noise and enhances the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of natural microseismic icequake events. We further show that this approach is inherently more efficient and effective than standard stop/pass band and white noise (e.g., Wiener) filtering routines, as well as a comparable self-supervised learning method based on masking individual DAS channels. Our preferred model for this task is lightweight, processing 30 seconds of data recorded at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz over 985 channels (approx. 1 km of fiber) in <1 s. Due to the high noise levels in DAS recordings, efficient data-driven denoising methods, such as DAS-N2N, will prove essential to time-critical DAS earthquake detection, particularly in the case of microseismic monitoring.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.
Builds on
10 of 68 references.
References · 10
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
- 2018Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Imagescited by 364
- 2019Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervisioncited by 276
- 2021Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, Advances and Challengescited by 148
- 2018Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2021The potential of self-supervised networks for random noise suppression in seismic datacited by 10
- 2022Transfer learning for self-supervised, blind-spot seismic denoisingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Analyzing the Sample Complexity of Self-Supervised Image Reconstruction Methodscited by 8
- 2025Physics-informed network paradigm with data generation and background noise removal for diverse distributed acoustic sensing applicationscited by 0
- 2026AstroSURE: Learning to Remove Noise from Astronomical Images Without Ground Truth Datacited by 0
- 2026Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Pre-Trained Vision Foundation Models for Active and Passive Seismic Data Denoisingcited by 0
- 2026Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Pre-Trained Vision Foundation Models for Active and Passive Seismic Data Denoising30 Apr 2026
- 2026AstroSURE: Learning to Remove Noise from Astronomical Images Without Ground Truth Data18 Apr 2026
- 2025Physics-informed network paradigm with data generation and background noise removal for diverse distributed acoustic sensing applications27 Jun 2025
- 2023Analyzing the Sample Complexity of Self-Supervised Image Reconstruction Methods30 May 2023