AstroSURE: Learning to Remove Noise from Astronomical Images Without Ground Truth Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In astronomical imaging, the low photon count of exposures necessitates extensive post-processing steps, including contamination removal and denoising. This paper evaluates deep-learning denoising methods that can be trained without clean ground-truth images and assesses their utility for detection11 oriented analysis of astronomical data. We adapt and compare Noise2Noise, Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimator, and blind-spot-based methods using synthetic data and real observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). Performance is evaluated using object-detection metrics, including correct detection rate and false alarm rate, together with image-based metrics and pixel-distribution diagnostics. The results show that these methods can improve faint-source detectability relative to the original noisy images, with encouraging gains on HST data after domain-consistent initialization, while transfer to CFHT data is more limited, highlighting the importance of instrument/domain similarity for unsupervised adaptation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 40 references.
References · 5
- 2026Deeper detection limits in astronomical imaging using self-supervised spatiotemporal denoisingcited by 6
- 2023DAS-N2N: Machine learning Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) signal denoising without clean datacited by 4
- 2024Radio-astronomical Image Reconstruction with Conditional Denoising Diffusion Modelcited by 4
- 2019Solar image denoising with convolutional neural networkscited by 3
- 2025AstroClearNet: Deep image prior for multi-frame astronomical image restorationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.