mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Zero to Hero: Examining the Power of Symbolic Tasks in Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2304.07995 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning language models on tasks with instructions has demonstrated potential in facilitating zero-shot generalization to unseen tasks. In this paper, we introduce a straightforward yet effective method for enhancing instruction tuning by employing symbolic tasks. Compared to crowdsourced human tasks or model-generated tasks, symbolic tasks present a unique advantage as they can be easily generated in vast quantities, theoretically providing an infinite supply of high-quality training instances. To explore the potential of symbolic tasks, we carry out an extensive case study on the representative symbolic task of SQL execution. Empirical results on various benchmarks validate that the integration of SQL execution leads to significant improvements in zero-shot scenarios, particularly in table reasoning. Notably, our 3B model surpasses both the 175B GPT-3 and ChatGPT in zero-shot table reasoning across four benchmarks. Furthermore, experimental results on BBH (27 tasks) and MMLU (57 tasks) reveal that language models can be enhanced through symbolic tasks without compromising their generality. We hope that our paper serves as a catalyst, inspiring increased efforts to incorporate symbolic tasks in instruction tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2023.

Builds on

53 of 65 references.

References · 53

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  9. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  11. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  12. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
38 more
  1. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  2. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  3. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  4. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  5. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  6. 2021MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Contextcited by 450
  7. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  8. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 425
  9. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  10. 2023Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 249
  11. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 233
  12. 2023Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decompose Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoningcited by 177
  13. 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
  14. 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
  15. 2021CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPcited by 142
  16. 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
  17. 2022Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasonerscited by 116
  18. 2019A Discrete Hard EM Approach for Weakly Supervised Question Answeringcited by 78
  19. 2020Grounded Adaptation for Zero-shot Executable Semantic Parsingcited by 76
  20. 2020Understanding tables with intermediate pre-trainingcited by 68
  21. 2020On the Potential of Lexico-logical Alignments for Semantic Parsing to SQL Queriescited by 59
  22. 2018Memory Augmented Policy Optimization for Program Synthesis and Semantic Parsingcited by 57
  23. 2022Reasoning Like Program Executorscited by 45
  24. 2022PASTA: Table-Operations Aware Fact Verification via Sentence-Table Cloze Pre-trainingcited by 41
  25. 2019Learning to Generalize from Sparse and Underspecified Rewardscited by 39
  26. 2023Investigating the Effectiveness of Task-Agnostic Prefix Prompt for Instruction Followingcited by 33
  27. 2015Neural Programmer: Inducing Latent Programs with Gradient Descentcited by 32
  28. 2020Program Enhanced Fact Verification with Verbalization and Graph Attention Networkcited by 29
  29. 2022OmniTab: Pretraining with Natural and Synthetic Data for Few-shot Table-based Question Answeringcited by 29
  30. 2019Learning Semantic Parsers from Denotations with Latent Structured Alignments and Abstract Programscited by 26
  31. 2020LogicalFactChecker: Leveraging Logical Operations for Fact Checking with Graph Module Networkcited by 26
  32. 2022Insights into Pre-training via Simpler Synthetic Taskscited by 25
  33. 2019Answering Conversational Questions on Structured Data without Logical Formscited by 24
  34. 2022TaCube: Pre-computing Data Cubes for Answering Numerical-Reasoning Questions over Tabular Datacited by 19
  35. 2016Learning a Natural Language Interface with Neural Programmercited by 14
  36. 2022Table-based Fact Verification with Self-adaptive Mixture of Expertscited by 12
  37. 2017Macro Grammars and Holistic Triggering for Efficient Semantic Parsingcited by 10
  38. 2017Building a Web-Scale Dependency-Parsed Corpus from CommonCrawlcited by 9

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 6; 2025: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: