mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Domain shifts in dermoscopic skin cancer datasets: Evaluation of essential limitations for clinical translation

arXiv 2304.06968 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The limited ability of Convolutional Neural Networks to generalize to images from previously unseen domains is a major limitation, in particular, for safety-critical clinical tasks such as dermoscopic skin cancer classification. In order to translate CNN-based applications into the clinic, it is essential that they are able to adapt to domain shifts. Such new conditions can arise through the use of different image acquisition systems or varying lighting conditions. In dermoscopy, shifts can also occur as a change in patient age or occurence of rare lesion localizations (e.g. palms). These are not prominently represented in most training datasets and can therefore lead to a decrease in performance. In order to verify the generalizability of classification models in real world clinical settings it is crucial to have access to data which mimics such domain shifts. To our knowledge no dermoscopic image dataset exists where such domain shifts are properly described and quantified. We therefore grouped publicly available images from ISIC archive based on their metadata (e.g. acquisition location, lesion localization, patient age) to generate meaningful domains. To verify that these domains are in fact distinct, we used multiple quantification measures to estimate the presence and intensity of domain shifts. Additionally, we analyzed the performance on these domains with and without an unsupervised domain adaptation technique. We observed that in most of our grouped domains, domain shifts in fact exist. Based on our results, we believe these datasets to be helpful for testing the generalization capabilities of dermoscopic skin cancer classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2023.

Builds on

17 of 61 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
  5. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  6. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
  7. 2020Learning to Generate Novel Domains for Domain Generalizationcited by 296
  8. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
  9. 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 224
  10. 2020A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Contextcited by 146
  11. 2021Causality-inspired Single-source Domain Generalization for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 118
  12. 2020Cross-Modality Paired-Images Generation for RGB-Infrared Person Re-Identificationcited by 71
5 more
  1. 2021A Survey of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Visual Recognitioncited by 31
  2. 2020Domain Divergences: a Survey and Empirical Analysiscited by 24
  3. 2018Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Classification of Prostate Histopathology Whole-Slide Imagescited by 21
  4. 2020Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via CycleGAN for White Matter Hyperintensity Segmentation in Multicenter MR Imagescited by 15
  5. 2022Recommendations on test datasets for evaluating AI solutions in pathologycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.