mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recommendations on test datasets for evaluating AI solutions in pathology

arXiv 2204.14226 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2022eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations for the collection of test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help regulatory agencies and end users verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 158 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2022.

Builds on

15 of 158 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  2. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  3. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
  4. 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 173
  5. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
  6. 2020PanNuke Dataset Extension, Insights and Baselinescited by 114
  7. 2021Lizard: A Large-Scale Dataset for Colonic Nuclear Instance Segmentation and Classificationcited by 89
  8. 2021Does Your Dermatology Classifier Know What It Doesn't Know? Detecting the Long-Tail of Unseen Conditionscited by 68
  9. 2021Negative Data Augmentationcited by 46
  10. 2020A Benchmark of Medical Out of Distribution Detectioncited by 40
  11. 2018Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Improving Gleason Scoring of Prostate Cancercited by 34
  12. 2021Confidence-based Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Comparative Study and Analysiscited by 34
3 more
  1. 2019PathologyGAN: Learning deep representations of cancer tissuecited by 32
  2. 2019FRODO: Free rejection of out-of-distribution samples: application to chest x-ray analysiscited by 5
  3. 2020A Pathologist-Annotated Dataset for Validating Artificial Intelligence: A Project Description and Pilot Studycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

8 papers.