mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improved Naive Bayes with Mislabeled Data

arXiv 2304.06292 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2023cs.LG stat.AP stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Labeling mistakes are frequently encountered in real-world applications. If not treated well, the labeling mistakes can deteriorate the classification performances of a model seriously. To address this issue, we propose an improved Naive Bayes method for text classification. It is analytically simple and free of subjective judgements on the correct and incorrect labels. By specifying the generating mechanism of incorrect labels, we optimize the corresponding log-likelihood function iteratively by using an EM algorithm. Our simulation and experiment results show that the improved Naive Bayes method greatly improves the performances of the Naive Bayes method with mislabeled data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2023.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  5. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  8. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  9. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
  10. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  11. 2015The MegaFace Benchmark: 1 Million Faces for Recognition at Scalecited by 200
  12. 2020Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentationcited by 79
2 more
  1. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  2. 2016A Unified View of Multi-Label Performance Measurescited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.