mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying the Impact of Data Characteristics on the Transferability of Sleep Stage Scoring Models

arXiv 2304.06033 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2023eess.SP cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for scoring sleep stages based on single-channel EEG have been proposed as a promising method for remote sleep monitoring. However, applying these models to new datasets, particularly from wearable devices, raises two questions. First, when annotations on a target dataset are unavailable, which different data characteristics affect the sleep stage scoring performance the most and by how much? Second, when annotations are available, which dataset should be used as the source of transfer learning to optimize performance? In this paper, we propose a novel method for computationally quantifying the impact of different data characteristics on the transferability of deep learning models. Quantification is accomplished by training and evaluating two models with significant architectural differences, TinySleepNet and U-Time, under various transfer configurations in which the source and target datasets have different recording channels, recording environments, and subject conditions. For the first question, the environment had the highest impact on sleep stage scoring performance, with performance degrading by over 14% when sleep annotations were unavailable. For the second question, the most useful transfer sources for TinySleepNet and the U-Time models were MASS-SS1 and ISRUC-SG1, containing a high percentage of N1 (the rarest sleep stage) relative to the others. The frontal and central EEGs were preferred for TinySleepNet. The proposed approach enables full utilization of existing sleep datasets for training and planning model transfer to maximize the sleep stage scoring performance on a target problem when sleep annotations are limited or unavailable, supporting the realization of remote sleep monitoring.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2023.

Builds on

12 of 41 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  2. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  3. 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
  4. 2017DeepSleepNet: a Model for Automatic Sleep Stage Scoring based on Raw Single-Channel EEGcited by 154
  5. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 125
  6. 2018SeqSleepNet: End-to-End Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Network for Sequence-to-Sequence Automatic Sleep Stagingcited by 90
  7. 2019U-Time: A Fully Convolutional Network for Time Series Segmentation Applied to Sleep Stagingcited by 87
  8. 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 79
  9. 2019SleepEEGNet: Automated Sleep Stage Scoring with Sequence to Sequence Deep Learning Approachcited by 54
  10. 2019Towards More Accurate Automatic Sleep Staging via Deep Transfer Learningcited by 31
  11. 2021DeepSleepNet-Lite: A Simplified Automatic Sleep Stage Scoring Model with Uncertainty Estimatescited by 26
  12. 2019Deep Transfer Learning for Single-Channel Automatic Sleep Staging with Channel Mismatchcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.