mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast Mixing of Data Augmentation Algorithms: Bayesian Probit, Logit, and Lasso Regression

arXiv 2412.07999 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2024math.ST math.PR stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose using a modified conductance-based method to study the mixing time of an important class of two-block Gibbs samplers, the data augmentation (DA) algorithm. %, which is of prominent interest in both theoretical and empirical research. Using this method, we prove the first non-asymptotic polynomial upper bounds on mixing times of three important DA algorithms: DA algorithms for Bayesian Probit regression (Albert and Chib, 1993, ProbitDA) and Bayesian Logit regression (Polson, Scott, and Windle, 2013, LogitDA), and Bayesian Lasso Regression (Park and Casella, 2008, Rajaratnam et al., 2015, LassoDA). Concretely, for ProbitDA and LogitDA, we demonstrate a tight bound that explicitly depends on the design matrix and prior covariance matrix. Under the assumption that data are independently generated from either a sub-Gaussian or log-concave distribution and properly scaled, the bound implies that with η-warm start, parameter dimension d, and sample size n, with high probability over data, the two algorithms require Oleft(nlog left(fraclog ηεright)right) steps to obtain samples with at most ε error in TV, KL, or chi2 distance. Meanwhile, we show that under minimal data assumptions, LassoDA requires Oleft(d2(dlog d +n log n)2 log left(fracηεright)right) steps to achieve ε-accuracy in TV distance. The results are generally applicable to settings with large n and large d, including settings with highly imbalanced response data in Probit and Logit regression. We compare them with the best known guarantees of Langevin Monte Carlo and Metropolis Adjusted Langevin Algorithm. We evaluate our theoretical results using numerical examples, and discuss the mixing times of the three algorithms under feasible initialization.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 121 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.

Builds on

33 of 121 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  2. 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 227
  3. 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 208
  4. 2015Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 197
  5. 2016High-dimensional Bayesian inference via the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 146
  6. 2018Analysis of Langevin Monte Carlo via convex optimizationcited by 127
  7. 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 118
  8. 2017User-friendly guarantees for the Langevin Monte Carlo with inaccurate gradientcited by 116
  9. 2017Convergence of Langevin MCMC in KL-divergencecited by 88
  10. 2019The Randomized Midpoint Method for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 78
  11. 2022Towards a Theory of Non-Log-Concave Sampling: First-Order Stationarity Guarantees for Langevin Monte Carlocited by 63
  12. 2020Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 57
21 more
  1. 2019Fast mixing of Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Benefits of multi-step gradientscited by 51
  2. 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 45
  3. 2021Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 44
  4. 2020Convergence of Langevin Monte Carlo in Chi-Squared and Renyi Divergencecited by 42
  5. 2019Proximal Langevin Algorithm: Rapid Convergence Under Isoperimetrycited by 34
  6. 2023Towards a Complete Analysis of Langevin Monte Carlo: Beyond Poincar'e Inequalitycited by 31
  7. 2023Improved Discretization Analysis for Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlocited by 28
  8. 2020Logsmooth Gradient Concentration and Tighter Runtimes for Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 22
  9. 2017Fast MCMC sampling algorithms on polytopescited by 17
  10. 2023When does Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo provably outperform Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm?cited by 15
  11. 2014Penalising model component complexity: A principled, practical approach to constructing priorscited by 13
  12. 2016Eldan's Stochastic Localization and the KLS Conjecture: Isoperimetry, Concentration and Mixingcited by 13
  13. 2024Entropy contraction of the Gibbs sampler under log-concavitycited by 13
  14. 2015MCMC-Based Inference in the Era of Big Data: A Fundamental Analysis of the Convergence Complexity of High-Dimensional Chainscited by 7
  15. 2013A Cubic Algorithm for Computing Gaussian Volumecited by 6
  16. 2014Bayesian Inference and Testing of Group Differences in Brain Networkscited by 6
  17. 2019Sampling for Bayesian Mixture Models: MCMC with Polynomial-Time Mixingcited by 5
  18. 2024Provably Efficient Posterior Sampling for Sparse Linear Regression via Measure Decompositioncited by 5
  19. 2020Ultimate P'olya Gamma Samplers -- Efficient MCMC for possibly imbalanced binary and categorical datacited by 4
  20. 2015Scalable Bayesian shrinkage and uncertainty quantification for high-dimensional regressioncited by 2
  21. 2018Limits on All Known (and Some Unknown) Approaches to Matrix Multiplicationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.