mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review: A Benchmark

arXiv 2304.03512 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific literature review generation aims to extract and organize important information from an abundant collection of reference papers and produces corresponding reviews while lacking a clear and logical hierarchy. We observe that a high-quality catalogue-guided generation process can effectively alleviate this problem. Therefore, we present an atomic and challenging task named Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review as the first step for review generation, which aims to produce a hierarchical catalogue of a review paper given various references. We construct a novel English Hierarchical Catalogues of Literature Reviews Dataset with 7.6k literature review catalogues and 389k reference papers. To accurately assess the model performance, we design two evaluation metrics for informativeness and similarity to ground truth from semantics and structure.Our extensive analyses verify the high quality of our dataset and the effectiveness of our evaluation metrics. We further benchmark diverse experiments on state-of-the-art summarization models like BART and large language models like ChatGPT to evaluate their capabilities. We further discuss potential directions for this task to motivate future research.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2023.

Builds on

24 of 62 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  5. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  6. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  7. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  8. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  9. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  10. 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 232
  11. 2020Multi-XScience: A Large-scale Dataset for Extreme Multi-document Summarization of Scientific Articlescited by 96
  12. 2021DOC2PPT: Automatic Presentation Slides Generation from Scientific Documentscited by 68
12 more
  1. 2021Exploring Neural Models for Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 44
  2. 2020Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasetscited by 36
  3. 2020Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documentscited by 35
  4. 2018Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart's Law in Actioncited by 22
  5. 2019X-SQL: reinforce schema representation with contextcited by 22
  6. 2021CitationIE: Leveraging the Citation Graph for Scientific Information Extractioncited by 19
  7. 2023Generating a Structured Summary of Numerous Academic Papers: Dataset and Methodcited by 16
  8. 2022Multi-Document Scientific Summarization from a Knowledge Graph-Centric Viewcited by 11
  9. 2019TopicEq: A Joint Topic and Mathematical Equation Model for Scientific Textscited by 10
  10. 2021Towards Generating Citation Sentences for Multiple References with Intent Controlcited by 9
  11. 2018Revisiting the tree edit distance and its backtracing: A tutorialcited by 8
  12. 2022Why Did You Not Compare With That? Identifying Papers for Use as Baselinescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

11 papers.