mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Characterizing the contribution of dependent features in XAI methods

arXiv 2304.01717 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2023stat.ML cs.LG stat.APcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) provides tools to help understanding how the machine learning models work and reach a specific outcome. It helps to increase the interpretability of models and makes the models more trustworthy and transparent. In this context, many XAI methods were proposed being SHAP and LIME the most popular. However, the proposed methods assume that used predictors in the machine learning models are independent which in general is not necessarily true. Such assumption casts shadows on the robustness of the XAI outcomes such as the list of informative predictors. Here, we propose a simple, yet useful proxy that modifies the outcome of any XAI feature ranking method allowing to account for the dependency among the predictors. The proposed approach has the advantage of being model-agnostic as well as simple to calculate the impact of each predictor in the model in presence of collinearity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2023.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  4. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  5. 2019Explaining black box decisions by Shapley cohort refinementcited by 26
  6. 2018What's in a GitHub Star? Understanding Repository Starring Practices in a Social Coding Platformcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.