mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

(Un)fair devices: Moving beyond AI accuracy in personal sensing

arXiv 2303.15585 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2023cs.CY cs.HC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Personal devices are omnipresent in our lives, seamlessly monitoring our activities, from smart rings tracking sleep patterns to smartwatches keeping an eye on missed heartbeats. The rich data streams from such devices fuel advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Instead of solely relying on direct sensor measurements, these applications are increasingly leveraging Machine Learning (ML) model estimates to derive insights. But are these estimates biased or not? This literature review delivers compelling evidence about the impact of hidden biases that creep into ML models deployed on personal devices. We discuss critical bias issues drawn from prior work such as racial bias in pulse oximeters, weight bias in optical heart rate sensors, and sex bias in audio-based diagnostics. In response to these challenges, we advocate for a shift from prioritizing performance-oriented evaluations of personal devices to adopting assessments grounded in a human-centered approach. To facilitate this transition, we provide guidelines for the design, development, evaluation, and use of unbiased AI in personal devices, recognizing their potential impact on improving our health, lifestyle, and productivity -- more than any other technology.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 140 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

Builds on

22 of 140 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  3. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  4. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  5. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  6. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
  7. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  8. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  9. 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
  10. 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
  11. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  12. 2018Mobile Sensor Data Anonymizationcited by 70
10 more
  1. 2020Exploring Automatic Diagnosis of COVID-19 from Crowdsourced Respiratory Sound Datacited by 60
  2. 2016Recognizing Detailed Human Context In-the-Wild from Smartphones and Smartwatchescited by 42
  3. 2020Self-supervised transfer learning of physiological representations from free-living wearable datacited by 27
  4. 2022The Larger The Fairer? Small Neural Networks Can Achieve Fairness for Edge Devicescited by 21
  5. 2022A Survey on Fairness for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 20
  6. 2020Incremental Real-Time Personalization in Human Activity Recognition Using Domain Adaptive Batch Normalizationcited by 13
  7. 2019NeckSense: A Multi-Sensor Necklace for Detecting Eating Activities in Free-Living Conditionscited by 12
  8. 2022Tiny, always-on and fragile: Bias propagation through design choices in on-device machine learning workflowscited by 8
  9. 2020Situated Data, Situated Systems: A Methodology to Engage with Power Relations in Natural Language Processing Researchcited by 6
  10. 2022FairGen: Fair Synthetic Data Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.