Temporal Graph Learning of Wearable Actigraphy and Sleep Traces for Modelling Adolescent Crystallized Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wearable actigraphy offers a scalable, ecologically valid alternative to episodic clinical assessment. However, predicting continuous adolescent crystallized intelligence (Gc) from such traces remains challenging due to irregular device adherence and complex behavioral-environmental interactions. We address this using daily summary data derived from 21-day Fitbit records of 6,091 adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (Release 5.1). We propose SATURN, a Sleep-Activity Temporal Unified Regression Network. It represents participants as 21-node temporal graphs encoding daily behaviors and temporal adjacency. To prevent imputation artifacts, invalid-day edges are dynamically pruned during forward passes. Node embeddings are refined via residual GATv2 layers, aggregated through masked attention pooling, and fused with sociodemographic covariates. Under family-controlled, age-sex-BMI-stratified cross-validation, SATURN achieves R2 = 0.2783 ± 0.0127, consistently improving upon flattened machine learning (Gradient Boosting, R2 = 0.2372) and sequential deep learning (BiLSTM, R2 = 0.2688) baselines. Explainability analyses identify light activity, metabolic equivalents, and sleep duration as dominant predictors, while Monte Carlo dropout and subgroup analyses confirm equitable performance across sociodemographic strata. Ultimately, SATURN establishes a rigorous computational framework for digital cognitive phenotyping, offering a scalable pathway to complement traditional assessments by highlighting macro-level behavioral anomalies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
8 of 31 references.
References · 8
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 554
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
- 2020Detecting Community Depression Dynamics Due to COVID-19 Pandemic in Australiacited by 10
- 2023(Un)fair devices: Moving beyond AI accuracy in personal sensingcited by 6
- 2023Federated Learning and Blockchain-enabled Fog-IoT Platform for Wearables in Predictive Healthcarecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.