mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sequential training of GANs against GAN-classifiers reveals correlated "knowledge gaps" present among independently trained GAN instances

arXiv 2303.15533 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) generate realistic images remarkably well. Previous work has demonstrated the feasibility of "GAN-classifiers" that are distinct from the co-trained discriminator, and operate on images generated from a frozen GAN. That such classifiers work at all affirms the existence of "knowledge gaps" (out-of-distribution artifacts across samples) present in GAN training. We iteratively train GAN-classifiers and train GANs that "fool" the classifiers (in an attempt to fill the knowledge gaps), and examine the effect on GAN training dynamics, output quality, and GAN-classifier generalization. We investigate two settings, a small DCGAN architecture trained on low dimensional images (MNIST), and StyleGAN2, a SOTA GAN architecture trained on high dimensional images (FFHQ). We find that the DCGAN is unable to effectively fool a held-out GAN-classifier without compromising the output quality. However, StyleGAN2 can fool held-out classifiers with no change in output quality, and this effect persists over multiple rounds of GAN/classifier training which appears to reveal an ordering over optima in the generator parameter space. Finally, we study different classifier architectures and show that the architecture of the GAN-classifier has a strong influence on the set of its learned artifacts.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2023.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  7. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  8. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  9. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  10. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
  11. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  12. 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
11 more
  1. 2018Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?cited by 188
  2. 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
  3. 2018ForensicTransfer: Weakly-supervised Domain Adaptation for Forgery Detectioncited by 104
  4. 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
  5. 2020Detecting CNN-Generated Facial Images in Real-World Scenarioscited by 32
  6. 2021Towards Universal GAN Image Detectioncited by 26
  7. 2021More Real than Real: A Study on Human Visual Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 23
  8. 2018Learning to Detect Fake Face Images in the Wildcited by 22
  9. 2022Making DeepFakes more spurious: evading deep face forgery detection via trace removal attackcited by 16
  10. 2020Adversarial Attacks on Co-Occurrence Features for GAN Detectioncited by 3
  11. 2021[RE] CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot...for nowcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.