Green Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid progress of AI is fueled by increasingly large and computationally intensive machine learning models and datasets. As a consequence, the amount of compute used in training state-of-the-art models is exponentially increasing (doubling every 10 months between 2015 and 2022), resulting in a large carbon footprint. Federated Learning (FL) - a collaborative machine learning technique for training a centralized model using data of decentralized entities - can also be resource-intensive and have a significant carbon footprint, particularly when deployed at scale. Unlike centralized AI that can reliably tap into renewables at strategically placed data centers, cross-device FL may leverage as many as hundreds of millions of globally distributed end-user devices with diverse energy sources. Green AI is a novel and important research area where carbon footprint is regarded as an evaluation criterion for AI, alongside accuracy, convergence speed, and other metrics. In this paper, we propose the concept of Green FL, which involves optimizing FL parameters and making design choices to minimize carbon emissions consistent with competitive performance and training time. The contributions of this work are two-fold. First, we adopt a data-driven approach to quantify the carbon emissions of FL by directly measuring real-world at-scale FL tasks running on millions of phones. Second, we present challenges, guidelines, and lessons learned from studying the trade-off between energy efficiency, performance, and time-to-train in a production FL system. Our findings offer valuable insights into how FL can reduce its carbon footprint, and they provide a foundation for future research in the area of Green AI.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2023.
Builds on
33 of 65 references.
References · 33
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
- 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 264
- 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
- 2019PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimizationcited by 234
- 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 219
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 202
21 more
- 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 188
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
- 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161
- 2015Character-Aware Neural Language Modelscited by 129
- 2022Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instancescited by 110
- 2019On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learningcited by 99
- 2021Papaya: Practical, Private, and Scalable Federated Learningcited by 89
- 2021Federated Evaluation and Tuning for On-Device Personalization: System Design & Applicationscited by 84
- 2021On Large-Cohort Training for Federated Learningcited by 73
- 2020Can Federated Learning Save The Planet?cited by 52
- 2021AutoFL: Enabling Heterogeneity-Aware Energy Efficient Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2021Resource-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2021Smart at what cost? Characterising Mobile Deep Neural Networks in the wildcited by 25
- 2023FLINT: A Platform for Federated Learning Integrationcited by 17
- 2022Treehouse: A Case For Carbon-Aware Datacenter Softwarecited by 12
- 2021Towards Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2022Reconciling Security and Communication Efficiency in Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2022FedGPO: Heterogeneity-Aware Global Parameter Optimization for Efficient Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2022BatteryLab: A Collaborative Platform for Power Monitoringcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clientscited by 7
- 2023Now It Sounds Like You: Learning Personalized Vocabulary On Devicecited by 2
- 2025Battery-aware Cyclic Scheduling in Energy-harvesting Federated Learningcited by 2
- 2025Personalizing Federated Learning for Hierarchical Edge Networks with Non-IID Datacited by 1
- 2023Holistic analysis on the sustainability of Federated Learning across AI product lifecyclecited by 0
- 2025Towards Carbon-Aware Container Orchestration: Predicting Workload Energy Consumption with Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Computation-aware Energy-harvesting Federated Learning with Pipelined Cyclic Schedulingcited by 0
- 2026CARGO: Carbon-Aware Gossip Orchestration in Smart Shippingcited by 0
- 2026CARGO: Carbon-Aware Gossip Orchestration in Smart Shipping29 Mar 2026
- 2025Computation-aware Energy-harvesting Federated Learning with Pipelined Cyclic Scheduling14 Nov 2025
- 2025Towards Carbon-Aware Container Orchestration: Predicting Workload Energy Consumption with Federated Learning4 Oct 2025
- 2025Battery-aware Cyclic Scheduling in Energy-harvesting Federated Learning16 Apr 2025
- 2025Personalizing Federated Learning for Hierarchical Edge Networks with Non-IID Data11 Apr 2025
- 2023Holistic analysis on the sustainability of Federated Learning across AI product lifecycle22 Dec 2023
- 2023Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clients19 Jun 2023
- 2023Now It Sounds Like You: Learning Personalized Vocabulary On Device5 May 2023