Towards Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Differentially Private Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, machine learning techniques utilizing large-scale datasets have achieved remarkable performance. Differential privacy, by means of adding noise, provides strong privacy guarantees for such learning algorithms. The cost of differential privacy is often a reduced model accuracy and a lowered convergence speed. This paper investigates the impact of differential privacy on learning algorithms in terms of their carbon footprint due to either longer run-times or failed experiments. Through extensive experiments, further guidance is provided on choosing the noise levels which can strike a balance between desired privacy levels and reduced carbon emissions.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2021.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
- 2020Can Federated Learning Save The Planet?cited by 52
- 2019Energy Usage Reports: Environmental awareness as part of algorithmic accountabilitycited by 44
- 2019Privacy-preserving Q-Learning with Functional Noise in Continuous State Spacescited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
- 2023Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 42
- 2025Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Surveycited by 14
- 2023FedZero: Leveraging Renewable Excess Energy in Federated Learningcited by 11
- 2023Energy and Carbon Considerations of Fine-Tuning BERTcited by 11
- 2025Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2023Green Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2024Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Machine Learning: Systematic Literature Review and Experimentscited by 3
- 2025Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey3 May 2025
- 2025Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Models8 Feb 2025
- 2024Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Machine Learning: Systematic Literature Review and Experiments27 Aug 2024
- 2023Energy and Carbon Considerations of Fine-Tuning BERT17 Nov 2023
- 2023FedZero: Leveraging Renewable Excess Energy in Federated Learning24 May 2023
- 2023Green Federated Learning26 Mar 2023
- 2023Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learning16 Feb 2023
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model3 Nov 2022