mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Kernel Methods Learn Better: From Cards to Process Optimization

arXiv 2303.14554 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2023cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mes-hallcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability of deep learning methods to perform classification and regression tasks relies heavily on their capacity to uncover manifolds in high-dimensional data spaces and project them into low-dimensional representation spaces. In this study, we investigate the structure and character of the manifolds generated by classical variational autoencoder (VAE) approaches and deep kernel learning (DKL). In the former case, the structure of the latent space is determined by the properties of the input data alone, while in the latter, the latent manifold forms as a result of an active learning process that balances the data distribution and target functionalities. We show that DKL with active learning can produce a more compact and smooth latent space which is more conducive to optimization compared to previously reported methods, such as the VAE. We demonstrate this behavior using a simple cards data set and extend it to the optimization of domain-generated trajectories in physical systems. Our findings suggest that latent manifolds constructed through active learning have a more beneficial structure for optimization problems, especially in feature-rich target-poor scenarios that are common in domain sciences, such as materials synthesis, energy storage, and molecular discovery. The jupyter notebooks that encapsulate the complete analysis accompany the article.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2023.

Builds on

19 of 70 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  2. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  3. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  4. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 283
  5. 2017Understanding Convolution for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
  6. 2016Variational Autoencoder for Deep Learning of Images, Labels and Captionscited by 137
  7. 2016An Uncertain Future: Forecasting from Static Images using Variational Autoencoderscited by 86
  8. 2019Deep Active Learning for Efficient Training of a LiDAR 3D Object Detectorcited by 45
  9. 2019Explicitly disentangling image content from translation and rotation with spatial-VAEcited by 28
  10. 2020Good practices for Bayesian Optimization of high dimensional structured spacescited by 24
  11. 2021Weather and Light Level Classification for Autonomous Driving: Dataset, Baseline and Active Learningcited by 20
  12. 2020Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the Robustness of Variational Autoencoderscited by 17
7 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Real Image Super-Resolution via Generative Variational AutoEncodercited by 16
  2. 2022Exploring Diversity-based Active Learning for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
  3. 2022Bayesian Active Learning for Scanning Probe Microscopy: from Gaussian Processes to Hypothesis Learningcited by 16
  4. 2021Regression markets and application to energy forecastingcited by 11
  5. 2022A Thermodynamics-informed Active Learning Approach to Perception and Reasoning about Fluidscited by 9
  6. 2022Active learning in open experimental environments: selecting the right information channel(s) based on predictability in deep kernel learningcited by 5
  7. 2023Discovery of structure-property relations for molecules via hypothesis-driven active learning over the chemical spacecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.