mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Uncertainty-Aware Aggregation for Fundus Diabetic Retinopathy Staging

arXiv 2303.13033 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models have shown promising performance in the field of diabetic retinopathy (DR) staging. However, collaboratively training a DR staging model across multiple institutions remains a challenge due to non-iid data, client reliability, and confidence evaluation of the prediction. To address these issues, we propose a novel federated uncertainty-aware aggregation paradigm (FedUAA), which considers the reliability of each client and produces a confidence estimation for the DR staging. In our FedUAA, an aggregated encoder is shared by all clients for learning a global representation of fundus images, while a novel temperature-warmed uncertainty head (TWEU) is utilized for each client for local personalized staging criteria. Our TWEU employs an evidential deep layer to produce the uncertainty score with the DR staging results for client reliability evaluation. Furthermore, we developed a novel uncertainty-aware weighting module (UAW) to dynamically adjust the weights of model aggregation based on the uncertainty score distribution of each client. In our experiments, we collect five publicly available datasets from different institutions to conduct a dataset for federated DR staging to satisfy the real non-iid condition. The experimental results demonstrate that our FedUAA achieves better DR staging performance with higher reliability compared to other federated learning methods. Our proposed FedUAA paradigm effectively addresses the challenges of collaboratively training DR staging models across multiple institutions, and provides a robust and reliable solution for the deployment of DR diagnosis models in real-world clinical scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2023.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  5. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  6. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  7. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  8. 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
  9. 2021FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalizationcited by 571
  10. 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
  11. 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 541
  12. 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 541
7 more
  1. 2022FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correctioncited by 181
  2. 2021Trusted Multi-View Classificationcited by 94
  3. 2021Applications of Deep Learning in Fundus Images: A Reviewcited by 59
  4. 2022Robust Calibration with Multi-domain Temperature Scalingcited by 39
  5. 2022TBraTS: Trusted Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 30
  6. 2018Deep Learning based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Surveycited by 19
  7. 2022Evidence fusion with contextual discounting for multi-modality medical image segmentationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.