Interpretable Reinforcement Learning via Neural Additive Models for Inventory Management
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of supply chains and the role of digital management to react to dynamic changes in the environment. In this work, we focus on developing dynamic inventory ordering policies for a multi-echelon, i.e. multi-stage, supply chain. Traditional inventory optimization methods aim to determine a static reordering policy. Thus, these policies are not able to adjust to dynamic changes such as those observed during the COVID-19 crisis. On the other hand, conventional strategies offer the advantage of being interpretable, which is a crucial feature for supply chain managers in order to communicate decisions to their stakeholders. To address this limitation, we propose an interpretable reinforcement learning approach that aims to be as interpretable as the traditional static policies while being as flexible and environment-agnostic as other deep learning-based reinforcement learning solutions. We propose to use Neural Additive Models as an interpretable dynamic policy of a reinforcement learning agent, showing that this approach is competitive with a standard full connected policy. Finally, we use the interpretability property to gain insights into a complex ordering strategy for a simple, linear three-echelon inventory supply chain.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2023.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
- 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2020FinRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Library for Automated Stock Trading in Quantitative Financecited by 86
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Agentic AI Framework for Smart Inventory Replenishmentcited by 5
- 2024Neural Additive Image Model: Interpretation through Interpolationcited by 1
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Platelet Inventory Managementcited by 0
- 2026Factorized Scheduling Principle: Learning Interpretable and Transferable Policies via Structured Additive Functionscited by 0
- 2026Factorized Scheduling Principle: Learning Interpretable and Transferable Policies via Structured Additive Functions29 Sep 2026
- 2026COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Platelet Inventory Management2 Mar 2026
- 2025Agentic AI Framework for Smart Inventory Replenishment28 Nov 2025
- 2024Neural Additive Image Model: Interpretation through Interpolation6 Mar 2024