On the Interplay Between Misspecification and Sub-optimality Gap in Linear Contextual Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study linear contextual bandits in the misspecified setting, where the expected reward function can be approximated by a linear function class up to a bounded misspecification level zeta>0. We propose an algorithm based on a novel data selection scheme, which only selects the contextual vectors with large uncertainty for online regression. We show that, when the misspecification level zeta is dominated by tilde O (Delta / √d) with Delta being the minimal sub-optimality gap and d being the dimension of the contextual vectors, our algorithm enjoys the same gap-dependent regret bound tilde O (d2/Delta) as in the well-specified setting up to logarithmic factors. In addition, we show that an existing algorithm SupLinUCB (Chu et al., 2011) can also achieve a gap-dependent constant regret bound without the knowledge of sub-optimality gap Delta. Together with a lower bound adapted from Lattimore et al. (2020), our result suggests an interplay between misspecification level and the sub-optimality gap: (1) the linear contextual bandit model is efficiently learnable when zeta ≤ tilde O(Delta / √d); and (2) it is not efficiently learnable when zeta ≥ tilde Omega(Delta / √d). Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets corroborate our theoretical results.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2023.
Builds on
16 of 26 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
- 2019Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?cited by 140
- 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 124
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
- 2020Logarithmic Regret for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 79
- 2021High-Dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel Banditscited by 55
- 2022Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Linear Contextual Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 51
- 2019Adaptive Exploration in Linear Contextual Banditcited by 43
4 more
- 2017Misspecified Linear Banditscited by 41
- 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
- 2019Comments on the Du-Kakade-Wang-Yang Lower Boundscited by 16
- 2021Uniform-PAC Bounds for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queriescited by 39
- 2023On the Model-Misspecification in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2024Corruption-Robust Linear Bandits: Minimax Optimality and Gap-Dependent Misspecificationcited by 6
- 2025Provably Efficient RL under Episode-Wise Safety in Constrained MDPs with Linear Function Approximationcited by 4
- 2024Achieving Constant Regret in Linear Markov Decision Processescited by 3
- 2026Turning Bias into Bugs: Bandit-Guided Style Manipulation Attacks on LLM Judgescited by 3
- 2026Turning Bias into Bugs: Bandit-Guided Style Manipulation Attacks on LLM Judges24 May 2026
- 2025Provably Efficient RL under Episode-Wise Safety in Constrained MDPs with Linear Function Approximation14 Feb 2025
- 2024Corruption-Robust Linear Bandits: Minimax Optimality and Gap-Dependent Misspecification10 Oct 2024
- 2024Achieving Constant Regret in Linear Markov Decision Processes16 Apr 2024
- 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queries14 Feb 2024
- 2023On the Model-Misspecification in Reinforcement Learning19 Jun 2023