Are Models Trained on Indian Legal Data Fair?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances and applications of language technology and artificial intelligence have enabled much success across multiple domains like law, medical and mental health. AI-based Language Models, like Judgement Prediction, have recently been proposed for the legal sector. However, these models are strife with encoded social biases picked up from the training data. While bias and fairness have been studied across NLP, most studies primarily locate themselves within a Western context. In this work, we present an initial investigation of fairness from the Indian perspective in the legal domain. We highlight the propagation of learnt algorithmic biases in the bail prediction task for models trained on Hindi legal documents. We evaluate the fairness gap using demographic parity and show that a decision tree model trained for the bail prediction task has an overall fairness disparity of 0.237 between input features associated with Hindus and Muslims. Additionally, we highlight the need for further research and studies in the avenues of fairness/bias in applying AI in the legal sector with a specific focus on the Indian context.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2021ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanationcited by 78
- 2022HLDC: Hindi Legal Documents Corpuscited by 11
- 2021Identifying biases in legal data: An algorithmic fairness perspectivecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.