mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Three Guidelines You Should Know for Universally Slimmable Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2303.06870 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose universally slimmable self-supervised learning (dubbed as US3L) to achieve better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs for deploying self-supervised models across different devices. We observe that direct adaptation of self-supervised learning (SSL) to universally slimmable networks misbehaves as the training process frequently collapses. We then discover that temporal consistent guidance is the key to the success of SSL for universally slimmable networks, and we propose three guidelines for the loss design to ensure this temporal consistency from a unified gradient perspective. Moreover, we propose dynamic sampling and group regularization strategies to simultaneously improve training efficiency and accuracy. Our US3L method has been empirically validated on both convolutional neural networks and vision transformers. With only once training and one copy of weights, our method outperforms various state-of-the-art methods (individually trained or not) on benchmarks including recognition, object detection and instance segmentation. Our code is available at https://github.com/megvii-research/US3L-CVPR2023.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2023.

Builds on

29 of 33 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,550
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,180
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,625
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,712
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,492
  9. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,266
  10. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,027
  11. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,786
  12. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,860
17 more
  1. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,315
  2. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,285
  3. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,612
  4. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,381
  5. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,023
  6. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 783
  7. 2016DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradientscited by 565
  8. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 442
  9. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
  10. 2018Slimmable Neural Networkscited by 302
  11. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistentcited by 255
  12. 2019Universally Slimmable Networks and Improved Training Techniquescited by 219
  13. 2021SEED: Self-supervised Distillation For Visual Representationcited by 132
  14. 2021Dynamic Slimmable Networkcited by 83
  15. 2022Vision Transformer Slimming: Multi-Dimension Searching in Continuous Optimization Spacecited by 66
  16. 2022Synergistic Self-supervised and Quantization Learningcited by 10
  17. 2022DATA: Domain-Aware and Task-Aware Self-supervised Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.