mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Visual Prompt Learning as Masked Visual Token Modeling

arXiv 2303.04998 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt learning has achieved great success in efficiently exploiting large-scale pre-trained models in natural language processing (NLP). It reformulates the downstream tasks as the generative pre-training ones to achieve consistency, thus improving the performance stably. However, when transferring it to the vision area, current visual prompt learning methods are almost designed on discriminative pre-trained models, and there is also a lack of careful design to unify the forms of pre-training and downstream tasks. To explore prompt learning on the generative pre-trained visual model, as well as keeping the task consistency, we propose Visual Prompt learning as masked visual Token Modeling (VPTM) to transform the downstream visual classification into the pre-trained masked visual token prediction. In addition, we develop the prototypical verbalizer for mapping the predicted visual token with implicit semantics to explicit downstream labels. To our best knowledge, VPTM is the first visual prompt method on the generative pre-trained visual model, which achieves consistency between pre-training and downstream visual classification by task reformulation. Experiments show that VPTM outperforms other visual prompt methods and achieves excellent efficiency. Moreover, the task consistency of VPTM contributes to the robustness against prompt location, prompt length and prototype dimension, and could be deployed uniformly.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2023.

Builds on

59 of 78 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  7. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  8. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  9. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  10. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  11. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  12. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
38 more
  1. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  2. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  3. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  4. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  6. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  8. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  10. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  12. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  13. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  14. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
  15. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
  16. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  17. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  18. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  19. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  20. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
  21. 2022DualPrompt: Complementary Prompting for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 642
  22. 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Language Representation with Informative Entitiescited by 528
  23. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 476
  24. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  25. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  26. 2022BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizerscited by 303
  27. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  28. 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
  29. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 236
  30. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
  31. 2021Knowledgeable Prompt-tuning: Incorporating Knowledge into Prompt Verbalizer for Text Classificationcited by 183
  32. 2021Template-Based Named Entity Recognition Using BARTcited by 153
  33. 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learningcited by 148
  34. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
  35. 2015Ask Me Anything: Dynamic Memory Networks for Natural Language Processingcited by 117
  36. 2021Differentiable Prompt Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 115
  37. 2020Automatically Identifying Words That Can Serve as Labels for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 98
  38. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.