Do Prosody Transfer Models Transfer Prosody?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Some recent models for Text-to-Speech synthesis aim to transfer the prosody of a reference utterance to the generated target synthetic speech. This is done by using a learned embedding of the reference utterance, which is used to condition speech generation. During training, the reference utterance is identical to the target utterance. Yet, during synthesis, these models are often used to transfer prosody from a reference that differs from the text or speaker being synthesized. To address this inconsistency, we propose to use a different, but prosodically-related, utterance during training too. We believe this should encourage the model to learn to transfer only those characteristics that the reference and target have in common. If prosody transfer methods do indeed transfer prosody they should be able to be trained in the way we propose. However, results show that a model trained under these conditions performs significantly worse than one trained using the target utterance as a reference. To explain this, we hypothesize that prosody transfer models do not learn a transferable representation of prosody, but rather an utterance-level representation which is highly dependent on both the reference speaker and reference text.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.
Builds on
16 of 27 references.
References · 16
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2020HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesiscited by 1,139
- 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
- 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 710
- 2018TADAM: Task dependent adaptive metric for improved few-shot learningcited by 408
- 2018Style Tokens: Unsupervised Style Modeling, Control and Transfer in End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 257
- 2018Towards End-to-End Prosody Transfer for Expressive Speech Synthesis with Tacotroncited by 171
- 2017Deep Voice 2: Multi-Speaker Neural Text-to-Speechcited by 75
- 2018Learning latent representations for style control and transfer in end-to-end speech synthesiscited by 61
- 2020Flowtron: an Autoregressive Flow-based Generative Network for Text-to-Speech Synthesiscited by 54
- 2018Robust and fine-grained prosody control of end-to-end speech synthesiscited by 48
4 more
- 2019Fine-grained robust prosody transfer for single-speaker neural text-to-speechcited by 27
- 2018Expressive Speech Synthesis via Modeling Expressions with Variational Autoencodercited by 22
- 2020CopyCat: Many-to-Many Fine-Grained Prosody Transfer for Neural Text-to-Speechcited by 22
- 2019Effective Use of Variational Embedding Capacity in Expressive End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Prosodic Structure Beyond Lexical Content: A Study of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2023Controllable Speaking Styles Using a Large Language Modelcited by 2
- 2024MultiVerse: Efficient and Expressive Zero-Shot Multi-Task Text-to-Speechcited by 1
- 2024A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Improving Cross-Text Prosody Transfercited by 0
- 2025Prosodic Structure Beyond Lexical Content: A Study of Self-Supervised Learning3 Jun 2025
- 2024MultiVerse: Efficient and Expressive Zero-Shot Multi-Task Text-to-Speech4 Oct 2024
- 2024A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Improving Cross-Text Prosody Transfer6 Jun 2024
- 2023Controllable Speaking Styles Using a Large Language Model17 May 2023