Approximate Cross-Validation for Structured Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many modern data analyses benefit from explicitly modeling dependence structure in data -- such as measurements across time or space, ordered words in a sentence, or genes in a genome. A gold standard evaluation technique is structured cross-validation (CV), which leaves out some data subset (such as data within a time interval or data in a geographic region) in each fold. But CV here can be prohibitively slow due to the need to re-run already-expensive learning algorithms many times. Previous work has shown approximate cross-validation (ACV) methods provide a fast and provably accurate alternative in the setting of empirical risk minimization. But this existing ACV work is restricted to simpler models by the assumptions that (i) data across CV folds are independent and (ii) an exact initial model fit is available. In structured data analyses, both these assumptions are often untrue. In the present work, we address (i) by extending ACV to CV schemes with dependence structure between the folds. To address (ii), we verify -- both theoretically and empirically -- that ACV quality deteriorates smoothly with noise in the initial fit. We demonstrate the accuracy and computational benefits of our proposed methods on a diverse set of real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without Refittingcited by 26
- 2021Uncertainty Quantification 360: A Holistic Toolkit for Quantifying and Communicating the Uncertainty of AIcited by 22
- 2021Toward a Taxonomy of Trust for Probabilistic Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2023Iterative Approximate Cross-Validationcited by 7
- 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankingscited by 7
- 2021Synthetic Data for Model Selectioncited by 6
- 2024TimeInf: Time Series Data Contribution via Influence Functionscited by 6
- 2024SOAK: Same/Other/All K-fold cross-validation for estimating similarity of patterns in data subsetscited by 0
- 2026TimeLAVA: Learning-Agnostic Valuation for Time Series Datacited by 0
- 2026TimeLAVA: Learning-Agnostic Valuation for Time Series Data17 Jun 2026
- 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankings16 Aug 2025
- 2024SOAK: Same/Other/All K-fold cross-validation for estimating similarity of patterns in data subsets11 Oct 2024
- 2024TimeInf: Time Series Data Contribution via Influence Functions21 Jul 2024
- 2023Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation5 Mar 2023
- 2022Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without Refitting13 Dec 2022
- 2021Toward a Taxonomy of Trust for Probabilistic Machine Learning5 Dec 2021
- 2021Uncertainty Quantification 360: A Holistic Toolkit for Quantifying and Communicating the Uncertainty of AI2 Jun 2021
- 2021Synthetic Data for Model Selection3 May 2021