Consistent Valid Physically-Realizable Adversarial Attack against Crowd-flow Prediction Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent works have shown that deep learning (DL) models can effectively learn city-wide crowd-flow patterns, which can be used for more effective urban planning and smart city management. However, DL models have been known to perform poorly on inconspicuous adversarial perturbations. Although many works have studied these adversarial perturbations in general, the adversarial vulnerabilities of deep crowd-flow prediction models in particular have remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we perform a rigorous analysis of the adversarial vulnerabilities of DL-based crowd-flow prediction models under multiple threat settings, making three-fold contributions. (1) We propose CaV-detect by formally identifying two novel properties - Consistency and Validity - of the crowd-flow prediction inputs that enable the detection of standard adversarial inputs with 0% false acceptance rate (FAR). (2) We leverage universal adversarial perturbations and an adaptive adversarial loss to present adaptive adversarial attacks to evade CaV-detect defense. (3) We propose CVPR, a Consistent, Valid and Physically-Realizable adversarial attack, that explicitly inducts the consistency and validity priors in the perturbation generation mechanism. We find out that although the crowd-flow models are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, it is extremely challenging to simulate these perturbations in physical settings, notably when CaV-detect is in place. We also show that CVPR attack considerably outperforms the adaptively modified standard attacks in FAR and adversarial loss metrics. We conclude with useful insights emerging from our work and highlight promising future research directions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2023.
Builds on
31 of 75 references.
References · 31
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
- 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 399
19 more
- 2016Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Predictioncited by 330
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
- 2020Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?cited by 79
- 2017Learning Traffic as Images: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Large-Scale Transportation Network Speed Predictioncited by 67
- 2021Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Boundscited by 64
- 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
- 2017MagNet and "Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks" are Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 46
- 2021Harnessing Perceptual Adversarial Patches for Crowd Countingcited by 39
- 2021Are socially-aware trajectory prediction models really socially-aware?cited by 32
- 2022Practical Adversarial Attacks on Spatiotemporal Traffic Forecasting Modelscited by 28
- 2019Harnessing the Vulnerability of Latent Layers in Adversarially Trained Modelscited by 26
- 2018QuSecNets: Quantization-based Defense Mechanism for Securing Deep Neural Network against Adversarial Attackscited by 21
- 2020PCNN: Deep Convolutional Networks for Short-term Traffic Congestion Predictioncited by 12
- 2018Adversarial Machine Learning And Speech Emotion Recognition: Utilizing Generative Adversarial Networks For Robustnesscited by 9
- 2020Targeted Physical-World Attention Attack on Deep Learning Models in Road Sign Recognitioncited by 7
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Cognitive Self-Organizing Networks: The Challenge and the Way Forwardcited by 6
- 2018SSCNets: Robustifying DNNs using Secure Selective Convolutional Filterscited by 4
- 2017Reliability and Sharpness in Border Crossing Traffic Interval Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.