mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Travel Demand Forecasting: A Fair AI Approach

arXiv 2303.01692 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning have been increasingly adopted for travel demand forecasting. The AI-based travel demand forecasting models, though generate accurate predictions, may produce prediction biases and raise fairness issues. Using such biased models for decision-making may lead to transportation policies that exacerbate social inequalities. However, limited studies have been focused on addressing the fairness issues of these models. Therefore, in this study, we propose a novel methodology to develop fairness-aware, highly-accurate travel demand forecasting models. Particularly, the proposed methodology can enhance the fairness of AI models for multiple protected attributes (such as race and income) simultaneously. Specifically, we introduce a new fairness regularization term, which is explicitly designed to measure the correlation between prediction accuracy and multiple protected attributes, into the loss function of the travel demand forecasting model. We conduct two case studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed methodology using real-world ridesourcing-trip data in Chicago, IL and Austin, TX, respectively. Results highlight that our proposed methodology can effectively enhance fairness for multiple protected attributes while preserving prediction accuracy. Additionally, we have compared our methodology with three state-of-the-art methods that adopt the regularization term approach, and the results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms them in both preserving prediction accuracy and enhancing fairness. This study can provide transportation professionals with a new tool to achieve fair and accurate travel demand forecasting.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2023.

Builds on

30 of 96 references.

References · 30

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
  5. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  6. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,125
  7. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
  8. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  11. 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 399
  12. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
18 more
  1. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  3. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  4. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  5. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  6. 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
  7. 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
  8. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  9. 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
  10. 2021FairFil: Contrastive Neural Debiasing Method for Pretrained Text Encoderscited by 75
  11. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
  12. 2021Directional Bias Amplificationcited by 54
  13. 2020Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencodercited by 45
  14. 2017Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessmentcited by 16
  15. 2021Equality of opportunity in travel behavior prediction with deep neural networks and discrete choice modelscited by 10
  16. 2017A Framework for Evaluating Epidemic Forecastscited by 7
  17. 2021Real-Time Forecasting of Dockless Scooter-Sharing Demand: A Spatio-Temporal Multi-Graph Transformer Approachcited by 6
  18. 2021Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Traffic Routing via Interpolated Traffic Assignmentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 5.

7 papers.