Mind the Gaps: Auditing and Reducing Group Inequity in Large-Scale Mobility Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Next location prediction underpins a growing number of mobility, retail, and public-health applications, yet its societal impacts remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we audit state-of-the-art mobility prediction models trained on a large-scale dataset, highlighting hidden disparities based on user demographics. Drawing from aggregate census data, we compute the difference in predictive performance on racial and ethnic user groups and show a systematic disparity resulting from the underlying dataset, resulting in large differences in accuracy based on location and user groups. To address this, we propose Fairness-Guided Incremental Sampling (FGIS), a group-aware sampling strategy designed for incremental data collection settings. Because individual-level demographic labels are unavailable, we introduce Size-Aware K-Means (SAKM), a clustering method that partitions users in latent mobility space while enforcing census-derived group proportions. This yields proxy racial labels for the four largest groups in the state: Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White. Built on these labels, our sampling algorithm prioritizes users based on expected performance gains and current group representation. This method incrementally constructs training datasets that reduce demographic performance gaps while preserving overall accuracy. Our method reduces total disparity between groups by up to 40% with minimal accuracy trade-offs, as evaluated on a state-of-art MetaPath2Vec model and a transformer-encoder model. Improvements are most significant in early sampling stages, highlighting the potential for fairness-aware strategies to deliver meaningful gains even in low-resource settings. Our findings expose structural inequities in mobility prediction pipelines and demonstrate how lightweight, data-centric interventions can improve fairness with little added complexity, especially for low-data applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
- 2019FairST: Equitable Spatial and Temporal Demand Prediction for New Mobility Systemscited by 13
- 2022How do you go where? Improving next location prediction by learning travel mode information using transformerscited by 12
- 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approachcited by 12
- 2021Equality of opportunity in travel behavior prediction with deep neural networks and discrete choice modelscited by 10
- 2023Fairness-enhancing deep learning for ride-hailing demand predictioncited by 9
- 2023Travel Demand Forecasting: A Fair AI Approachcited by 7
- 2017Size Matters: Cardinality-Constrained Clustering and Outlier Detection via Conic Optimizationcited by 6
- 2024MobilityDL: A Review of Deep Learning From Trajectory Datacited by 6
- 2023Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systemscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.