Iterative Circuit Repair Against Formal Specifications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a deep learning approach for repairing sequential circuits against formal specifications given in linear-time temporal logic (LTL). Given a defective circuit and its formal specification, we train Transformer models to output circuits that satisfy the corresponding specification. We propose a separated hierarchical Transformer for multimodal representation learning of the formal specification and the circuit. We introduce a data generation algorithm that enables generalization to more complex specifications and out-of-distribution datasets. In addition, our proposed repair mechanism significantly improves the automated synthesis of circuits from LTL specifications with Transformers. It improves the state-of-the-art by 6.8 percentage points on held-out instances and 11.8 percentage points on an out-of-distribution dataset from the annual reactive synthesis competition.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2023.
Builds on
11 of 41 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Teaching Temporal Logics to Neural Networkscited by 51
- 2022Formal Specifications from Natural Languagecited by 33
- 2021Neural Circuit Synthesis from Specification Patternscited by 17
- 2018BoSy: An Experimentation Framework for Bounded Synthesiscited by 8
- 2022The Reactive Synthesis Competition (SYNTCOMP): 2018-2021cited by 8
- 2021Generating Symbolic Reasoning Problems with Transformer GANscited by 5
- 2021Visual Analysis of Hyperproperties for Understanding Model Checking Resultscited by 2
- 2022OCTAL: Graph Representation Learning for LTL Model Checkingcited by 2
- 2020Explainable Reactive Synthesiscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023nl2spec: Interactively Translating Unstructured Natural Language to Temporal Logics with Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2025SemML: Enhancing Automata-Theoretic LTL Synthesis with Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2023Guessing Winning Policies in LTL Synthesis by Semantic Learningcited by 4
- 2024NeuroSynt: A Neuro-symbolic Portfolio Solver for Reactive Synthesiscited by 3
- 2024Towards Specification-Driven LLM-Based Generation of Embedded Automotive Softwarecited by 2
- 2024Learning Better Representations From Less Data For Propositional Satisfiabilitycited by 1
- 2025Learning Representations Through Contrastive Neural Model Checkingcited by 0
- 2026Natural Synthesis: Outperforming Reactive Synthesis Tools with Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Translating Natural Language to Strategic Temporal Specifications via LLMscited by 0
- 2026Translating Natural Language to Strategic Temporal Specifications via LLMs29 Jun 2026
- 2026Natural Synthesis: Outperforming Reactive Synthesis Tools with Large Reasoning Models14 May 2026
- 2025Learning Representations Through Contrastive Neural Model Checking2 Oct 2025
- 2025SemML: Enhancing Automata-Theoretic LTL Synthesis with Machine Learning29 Jan 2025
- 2024Towards Specification-Driven LLM-Based Generation of Embedded Automotive Software20 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning Better Representations From Less Data For Propositional Satisfiability13 Feb 2024
- 2024NeuroSynt: A Neuro-symbolic Portfolio Solver for Reactive Synthesis22 Jan 2024
- 2023Guessing Winning Policies in LTL Synthesis by Semantic Learning24 May 2023
- 2023nl2spec: Interactively Translating Unstructured Natural Language to Temporal Logics with Large Language Models8 Mar 2023