mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Framework for Neurosymbolic Robot Action Planning using Large Language Models

arXiv 2303.00438 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2023cs.AI cs.LG cs.ROcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic task planning is a widely used approach to enforce robot autonomy due to its ease of understanding and deployment in robot architectures. However, techniques for symbolic task planning are difficult to scale in real-world, human-robot collaboration scenarios because of the poor performance in complex planning domains or when frequent re-planning is needed. We present a framework, Teriyaki, specifically aimed at bridging the gap between symbolic task planning and machine learning approaches. The rationale is training Large Language Models (LLMs), namely GPT-3, into a neurosymbolic task planner compatible with the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), and then leveraging its generative capabilities to overcome a number of limitations inherent to symbolic task planners. Potential benefits include (i) a better scalability in so far as the planning domain complexity increases, since LLMs' response time linearly scales with the combined length of the input and the output, and (ii) the ability to synthesize a plan action-by-action instead of end-to-end, making each action available for execution as soon as it is generated instead of waiting for the whole plan to be available, which in turn enables concurrent planning and execution. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted by the research community to evaluate the cognitive capabilities of LLMs, with alternate successes. Instead, with Teriyaki we aim to provide an overall planning performance comparable to traditional planners in specific planning domains, while leveraging LLMs capabilities to build a look-ahead predictive planning model. Preliminary results in selected domains show that our method can: (i) solve 95.5% of problems in a test data set of 1,000 samples; (ii) produce plans up to 13.5% shorter than a traditional symbolic planner; (iii) reduce average overall waiting times for a plan availability by up to 61.4%

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  6. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  7. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  8. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  9. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  10. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
  11. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
  12. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
8 more
  1. 2020Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd Wavecited by 253
  2. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
  3. 2022Few-shot Subgoal Planning with Language Modelscited by 22
  4. 2020A Hierarchical Architecture for Human-Robot Cooperation Processescited by 12
  5. 2018On the manipulation of articulated objects in human-robot cooperation scenarioscited by 7
  6. 2020Manipulation of Articulated Objects using Dual-arm Robots via Answer Set Programmingcited by 7
  7. 2017Flexible human-robot cooperation models for assisted shop-floor taskscited by 5
  8. 2020Deployment and Evaluation of a Flexible Human-Robot Collaboration Model Based on AND/OR Graphs in a Manufacturing Environmentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

11 papers.