mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable and intervenable ultrasonography-based machine learning models for pediatric appendicitis

arXiv 2302.14460 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.CV eess.IVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Appendicitis is among the most frequent reasons for pediatric abdominal surgeries. Previous decision support systems for appendicitis have focused on clinical, laboratory, scoring, and computed tomography data and have ignored abdominal ultrasound, despite its noninvasive nature and widespread availability. In this work, we present interpretable machine learning models for predicting the diagnosis, management and severity of suspected appendicitis using ultrasound images. Our approach utilizes concept bottleneck models (CBM) that facilitate interpretation and interaction with high-level concepts understandable to clinicians. Furthermore, we extend CBMs to prediction problems with multiple views and incomplete concept sets. Our models were trained on a dataset comprising 579 pediatric patients with 1709 ultrasound images accompanied by clinical and laboratory data. Results show that our proposed method enables clinicians to utilize a human-understandable and intervenable predictive model without compromising performance or requiring time-consuming image annotation when deployed. For predicting the diagnosis, the extended multiview CBM attained an AUROC of 0.80 and an AUPR of 0.92, performing comparably to similar black-box neural networks trained and tested on the same dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 79 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  6. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,004
  7. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  8. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  9. 2018Generative Image Inpainting with Contextual Attentioncited by 578
  10. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  11. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  12. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
13 more
  1. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
  2. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  3. 2013A Survey on Multi-view Learningcited by 152
  4. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 128
  5. 2021Do Concept Bottleneck Models Learn as Intended?cited by 114
  6. 2016HeMIS: Hetero-Modal Image Segmentationcited by 102
  7. 2020Stochastic Segmentation Networks: Modelling Spatially Correlated Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 100
  8. 2015Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representationscited by 94
  9. 2022Concept Bottleneck Model with Additional Unsupervised Conceptscited by 79
  10. 2022GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Modelscited by 73
  11. 2022A survey of multimodal deep generative modelscited by 47
  12. 2018Cats or CAT scans: transfer learning from natural or medical image source datasets?cited by 14
  13. 2022Provable concept learning for interpretable predictions using variational autoencoderscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.