mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting microsatellite instability and key biomarkers in colorectal cancer from H&E-stained images: Achieving SOTA predictive performance with fewer data using Swin Transformer

arXiv 2208.10495 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2022q-bio.QM cs.LG eess.IVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed for predicting clinically relevant biomarkers, including microsatellite instability (MSI), for colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the current deep-learning networks are data-hungry and require large training datasets, which are often lacking in the medical domain. In this study, based on the latest Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows (Swin-T), we developed an efficient workflow for biomarkers in CRC (MSI, hypermutation, chromosomal instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, BRAF, and TP53 mutation) that only required relatively small datasets, but achieved the state-of-the-art (SOTA) predictive performance. Our Swin-T workflow not only substantially outperformed published models in an intra-study cross-validation experiment using TCGA-CRC-DX dataset (N = 462), but also showed excellent generalizability in cross-study external validation and delivered a SOTA AUROC of 0.90 for MSI using the MCO dataset for training (N = 1065) and the same TCGA-CRC-DX for testing. Similar performance (AUROC=0.91) was achieved by Echle and colleagues using approximately 8000 training samples (ResNet18) on the same testing dataset. Swin-T was extremely efficient using small training datasets and exhibits robust predictive performance with only 200-500 training samples. These data indicate that Swin-T may be 5-10 times more efficient than the current state-of-the-art algorithms for MSI based on ResNet18 and ShuffleNet. Furthermore, the Swin-T models showed promise as pre-screening tests for MSI status and BRAF mutation status, which could exclude and reduce the samples before the subsequent standard testing in a cascading diagnostic workflow to allow turnaround time reduction and cost saving.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2022.

Builds on

7 of 37 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2018Classification and Disease Localization in Histopathology Using Only Global Labels: A Weakly-Supervised Approachcited by 33
  5. 2021DeepSMILE: Contrastive self-supervised pre-training benefits MSI and HRD classification directly from H&E whole-slide images in colorectal and breast cancercited by 27
  6. 2021A Retrospective Analysis using Deep-Learning Models for Prediction of Survival Outcome and Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancercited by 4
  7. 2022A robust and lightweight deep attention multiple instance learning algorithm for predicting genetic alterationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.