mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fourier Analysis Meets Runtime Analysis: Precise Runtimes on Plateaus

arXiv 2302.08021 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2023cs.NE cs.AI cs.DScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new method based on discrete Fourier analysis to analyze the time evolutionary algorithms spend on plateaus. This immediately gives a concise proof of the classic estimate of the expected runtime of the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm on the Needle problem due to Garnier, Kallel, and Schoenauer (1999). We also use this method to analyze the runtime of the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm on a new benchmark consisting of n/ℓ plateaus of effective size 2ℓ-1 which have to be optimized sequentially in a LeadingOnes fashion. Using our new method, we determine the precise expected runtime both for static and fitness-dependent mutation rates. We also determine the asymptotically optimal static and fitness-dependent mutation rates. For ℓ = o(n), the optimal static mutation rate is approximately 1.59/n. The optimal fitness dependent mutation rate, when the first k fitness-relevant bits have been found, is asymptotically 1/(k+1). These results, so far only proven for the single-instance problem LeadingOnes, thus hold for a much broader class of problems. We expect similar extensions to be true for other important results on LeadingOnes. We are also optimistic that our Fourier analysis approach can be applied to other plateau problems as well.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.

Builds on

24 of 106 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Fast Genetic Algorithmscited by 29
  2. 2018Probabilistic Tools for the Analysis of Randomized Optimization Heuristicscited by 24
  3. 2019Benchmarking Discrete Optimization Heuristics with IOHprofilercited by 14
  4. 2018Better Runtime Guarantees Via Stochastic Dominationcited by 13
  5. 2019Self-Adjusting Mutation Rates with Provably Optimal Success Rulescited by 13
  6. 2019The Runtime of the Compact Genetic Algorithm on Jump Functionscited by 13
  7. 2020Theoretical Analyses of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms on Multimodal Objectivescited by 12
  8. 2020Fixed-Target Runtime Analysiscited by 9
  9. 2014Level-based Analysis of Genetic Algorithms and other Search Processescited by 8
  10. 2019On the Limitations of the Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm to Deception and Where Bivariate EDAs might helpcited by 8
  11. 2018Significance-based Estimation-of-Distribution Algorithmscited by 6
  12. 2018Level-Based Analysis of the Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithmcited by 6
12 more
  1. 2018Analysing the Robustness of Evolutionary Algorithms to Noise: Refined Runtime Bounds and an Example Where Noise is Beneficialcited by 5
  2. 2021Lower Bounds from Fitness Levels Made Easycited by 5
  3. 2021Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theorycited by 5
  4. 2018Precise Runtime Analysis for Plateau Functionscited by 4
  5. 2018The Query Complexity of a Permutation-Based Variant of Mastermindcited by 4
  6. 2019Multiplicative Up-Driftcited by 4
  7. 2020Lower Bounds for Non-Elitist Evolutionary Algorithms via Negative Multiplicative Driftcited by 3
  8. 2017Running Time Analysis of the (1+1)-EA for OneMax and LeadingOnes under Bit-wise Noisecited by 2
  9. 2020Exponential Upper Bounds for the Runtime of Randomized Search Heuristicscited by 2
  10. 2019Fast Re-Optimization via Structural Diversitycited by 1
  11. 2020On Non-Elitist Evolutionary Algorithms Optimizing Fitness Functions with a Plateaucited by 1
  12. 2020Improved Fixed-Budget Results via Drift Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.