Spatially heterogeneous learning by a deep student machine
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNN) with a huge number of adjustable parameters remain largely black boxes. To shed light on the hidden layers of DNN, we study supervised learning by a DNN of width N and depth L consisting of NL perceptrons with c inputs by a statistical mechanics approach called the teacher-student setting. We consider an ensemble of student machines that exactly reproduce M sets of N dimensional input/output relations provided by a teacher machine. We show that the problem becomes exactly solvable in what we call as 'dense limit': N gg c gg 1 and M gg 1 with fixed α=M/c using the replica method developed in (H. Yoshino, (2020)). We also study the model numerically performing simple greedy MC simulations. Simulations reveal that learning by the DNN is quite heterogeneous in the network space: configurations of the teacher and the student machines are more correlated within the layers closer to the input/output boundaries while the central region remains much less correlated due to the over-parametrization in qualitative agreement with the theoretical prediction. We evaluate the generalization-error of the DNN with various depth L both theoretically and numerically. Remarkably both the theory and simulation suggest generalization-ability of the student machines, which are only weakly correlated with the teacher in the center, does not vanish even in the deep limit L gg 1 where the system becomes heavily over-parametrized. We also consider the impact of effective dimension D(≤ N) of data by incorporating the hidden manifold model (S. Goldt et. al., (2020)) into our model. The theory implies that the loop corrections to the dense limit become enhanced by either decreasing the width N or decreasing the effective dimension D of the data. Simulation suggests both lead to significant improvements in generalization-ability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2023.
Builds on
18 of 58 references.
References · 18
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 422
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2016Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaoscited by 260
- 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
- 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
- 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
- 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
- 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
- 2018Entropy and mutual information in models of deep neural networkscited by 50
6 more
- 2023Bayes-optimal Learning of Deep Random Networks of Extensive-widthcited by 41
- 2023Deterministic equivalent and error universality of deep random features learningcited by 35
- 2019The spiked matrix model with generative priorscited by 20
- 2022Fluctuations, Bias, Variance & Ensemble of Learners: Exact Asymptotics for Convex Losses in High-Dimensioncited by 19
- 2019From complex to simple : hierarchical free-energy landscape renormalized in deep neural networkscited by 2
- 2020Data-driven effective model shows a liquid-like deep learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.