mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linguistic ambiguity analysis in ChatGPT

arXiv 2302.06426 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linguistic ambiguity is and has always been one of the main challenges in Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. Modern Transformer architectures like BERT, T5 or more recently InstructGPT have achieved some impressive improvements in many NLP fields, but there is still plenty of work to do. Motivated by the uproar caused by ChatGPT, in this paper we provide an introduction to linguistic ambiguity, its varieties and their relevance in modern NLP, and perform an extensive empiric analysis. ChatGPT strengths and weaknesses are revealed, as well as strategies to get the most of this model.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

8 of 30 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  4. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  5. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  6. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  7. 2020Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systemscited by 282
  8. 2020A Survey on Contextual Embeddingscited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: